Kinematics of the Human Knee Using an Open Chain Cadaver Model

There continues to be controversy about the kinematics of the human knee. This study used seven knees from cadavers moved by pulling on the quadriceps tendon in an open chain fashion using video motion analysis to determine the instantaneous helical axis of movement. Computed tomography scans of the specimens allowed the axes to be related to condyles. The parameter β was defined by the relationship of the helical axis to the center of the condyle (pure spinning motion) and the contact point of the condyle on the tibia (pure rolling motion). Axes above the center of the condyle represent countertranslation, those between the center and the contact point combined spinning and rolling, and those below represent concordant translation. If the motion of the knee is guided by the crossed four-bar link then this model, that allows the knee to ‘seek its own path’ throughout the range of motion, should show the rollback that commonly is thought to be an important feature of knee motion. The results of this study show that the medial side of the knee stays stable in spinning kinematics whereas the lateral side has a rolling motion in full flexion progressing to a spinning motion in midflexion and counter-translation near full extension. The kinematics that would be expected from rollback were not observed.

[1]  R van Dijk,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric methods for the evaluation of the three dimensional kinematic behaviour and cruciate ligament length patterns of the human knee joint. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  J B Stiehl,et al.  In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  M. Freeman,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 4: changes of axial tibial rotation caused by forced rotation at the weight-bearing knee studied by RSA. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  W Simons,et al.  Differentiation of human motion data using combined spline and least squares concepts. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  Y Yamano,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  D A Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Knee Kinematics Derived Using an Inverse Perspective Technique , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  L. Blankevoort,et al.  The envelope of passive knee joint motion. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  B. Beynnon,et al.  The Transepicondylar Axis Approximates the Optimal Flexion Axis of the Knee , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  D A Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Anteroposterior Femorotibial Translation of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Cervical flexion and extension radiographs in acutely injured patients. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  L Blankevoort,et al.  Helical axes of passive knee joint motions. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  J. O'Connor,et al.  The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  P S Walker,et al.  Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Writings on the knee between 1836 and 1917. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Axes of Rotation of the Knee , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.