UV-Radiation: From Physics to Impacts

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation has affected life at least since the first life forms moved out of the seas and crawled onto the land. Therefore, one might assume that evolution has adapted to natural UV radiation. However, evolution is mostly concerned with the propagation of the genetic code, not with a long, happy, and fulfilling life. Because rickets is bad for a woman giving birth, the beneficial effects of UV-radiation outweigh the adverse effects like aged skin and skin tumors of various grades of malignancy that usually only afflict us at older age. Anthropogenic damage to the stratospheric ozone layer and frighteningly high rates of melanoma skin cancer in the light-skinned descendants of British settlers in Australia piqued interest in the health impacts of UV radiation. A changing cultural perception of the beauty of tanned versus light skin and commercial interests in selling UV-emitting devices such as tanning booths caught public health experts off-guard. Counseling and health communication are extremely difficult when dealing with a “natural” risk factor, especially when this risk factor cannot (and should not) be completely avoided. How much is too much for whom or for which skin type? How even measure “much”? Is it the (cumulative) dose or the dose rate that matters most? Or should we even construct a more complex metric such as the cumulative dose above a certain dose rate threshold? We find there are still many open questions, and we are glad that this special issue offered us the opportunity to present many interesting aspects of this important topic.

[1]  L. Dennis,et al.  Temporal Trends in Satellite-Derived Erythemal UVB and Implications for Ambient Sun Exposure Assessment , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  D. Haluza,et al.  25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status and Risk for Colorectal Cancer and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  Josephine Lau,et al.  A Case Study of Upper-Room UVGI in Densely-Occupied Elementary Classrooms by Real-Time Fluorescent Bioaerosol Measurements , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  M. Amyot,et al.  Mercury, hydroquinone and clobetasol propionate in skin lightening products in West Africa and Canada. , 2016, Environmental research.

[5]  R. Lucas,et al.  Vitamin D Status and Its Consequences for Health in South Africa , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  D. Haluza,et al.  Environmental Research and Public Health Uv " Indices " —what Do They Indicate? , 2022 .

[7]  D. Haluza,et al.  Beneficial Effects of UV-Radiation: Vitamin D and beyond , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[8]  O. Gefeller,et al.  Protection from Ultraviolet Radiation during Childhood: The Parental Perspective in Bavaria , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  D. Haluza,et al.  Environmental Research and Public Health Sun Exposure and Its Effects on Human Health: Mechanisms through Which Sun Exposure Could Reduce the Risk of Developing Obesity and Cardiometabolic Dysfunction , 2022 .

[10]  Gunther Seckmeyer,et al.  Is Multidirectional UV Exposure Responsible for Increasing Melanoma Prevalence with Altitude? A Hypothesis Based on Calculations with a 3D-Human Exposure Model , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[11]  G. Cevenini,et al.  Time Effectiveness of Ultraviolet C Light (UVC) Emitted by Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) in Reducing Stethoscope Contamination , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  D. Haluza,et al.  Sunbed Use Prevalence and Associated Skin Health Habits: Results of a Representative, Population-Based Survey among Austrian Residents , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  D. Haluza,et al.  Gender aspects of recreational sun‐protective behavior: results of a representative, population‐based survey among Austrian residents , 2016, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.

[14]  D. Haluza,et al.  Sun Exposure Prevalence and Associated Skin Health Habits: Results from the Austrian Population-Based UVSkinRisk Survey , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[15]  D. Haluza,et al.  Perceived Relevance of Educative Information on Public (Skin) Health: Results of a Representative, Population-Based Telephone Survey , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[16]  D. Haluza,et al.  Public (Skin) Health perspectives of gender differences in tanning habits and sun protective behaviour: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey , 2015, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[17]  Kyungho Choi,et al.  Occurrences, toxicities, and ecological risks of benzophenone-3, a common component of organic sunscreen products: a mini-review. , 2014, Environment international.

[18]  D. Haluza,et al.  Public (Skin) Health and the publishing source bias of Austrian information material , 2014 .

[19]  Kumar Sinniah,et al.  Spectrometric analysis of mercury content in 549 skin-lightening products: is mercury toxicity a hidden global health hazard? , 2014, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[20]  M. Fitzka,et al.  Total ozone and Umkehr observations at Hoher Sonnblick 1994–2011: Climatology and extreme events , 2014 .

[21]  D. Haluza,et al.  Connectedness to Nature and Public (Skin) Health Perspectives: Results of a Representative, Population-Based Survey among Austrian Residents , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[22]  D. Haluza,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Melanoma Trends in Austria: An Ecological Study , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[23]  T. Hwang,et al.  The cytotoxicity of mercury chloride to the keratinocytes is associated with metallothionein expression. , 2013, Biomedical reports.

[24]  D. Haluza,et al.  Perceived Relevance of Educative Information on Public (Skin) Health: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire Survey , 2013, Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi.

[25]  M. Fitzka,et al.  Trends in spectral UV radiation from long-term measurements at Hoher Sonnblick, Austria , 2012, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[26]  G. Nohynek,et al.  Nano-sized cosmetic formulations or solid nanoparticles in sunscreens: A risk to human health? , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.

[27]  T. Smijs,et al.  Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: focus on their safety and effectiveness. , 2011, Nanotechnology, science and applications.

[28]  P. Weihs,et al.  Factors affecting UV irradiance at selected wavelengths at Hoher Sonnblick , 2011 .

[29]  M. Blumthaler,et al.  Relationship between high daily erythemal UV doses, total ozone, surface albedo and cloudiness: An analysis of 30 years of data from Switzerland and Austria , 2010 .

[30]  Deevya L. Narayanan,et al.  Review: Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer , 2010, International journal of dermatology.

[31]  P. Jacobsen,et al.  Appearance reasons for tanning mediate the relationship between media influence and UV exposure and sun protection. , 2006, Archives of dermatology.

[32]  H. Jarry,et al.  Multi-organic endocrine disrupting activity of the UV screen benzophenone 2 (BP2) in ovariectomized adult rats after 5 days treatment. , 2004, Toxicology.

[33]  N. Martin,et al.  Increasing incidence of cutaneous melanoma in Queensland, Australia. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  J. Moan,et al.  ULTRAVIOLET‐RADIATION and SKIN CANCER. EFFECT OF AN OZONE LAYER DEPLETION , 1990, Photochemistry and photobiology.