Song-based Classification techniques for Endangered Bird Conservation

The work presented in this paper is part of a global framework which long term goal is to design a wireless sensor network able to support the observation of a population of endangered birds. We present the first stage for which we have conducted a knowledge discovery approach on a sample of acoustical data. We use MFCC features extracted from bird songs and we exploit two knowledge discovery techniques. One that relies on clustering-based approaches, that highlights the homogeneity in the songs of the species. The other, based on predictive modeling, that demonstrates the good performances of various machine learning techniques for the identification process. The knowledge elicited provides promising results to consider a widespread study and to elicit guidelines for designing a first version of the automatic approach for data collection based on acoustic sensors.

[1]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[2]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  Speaker identification and verification using Gaussian mixture speaker models , 1995, Speech Commun..

[3]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  Reducing Misclassification Costs , 1994, ICML.

[4]  S. Chiba,et al.  Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition , 1978 .

[5]  Jinhai Cai,et al.  Sensor Network for the Monitoring of Ecosystem: Bird Species Recognition , 2007, 2007 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information.

[6]  Detlev Langmann,et al.  A comparative study of linear feature transformation techniques for automatic speech recognition , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[7]  Irina Rish,et al.  An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier , 2001 .

[8]  Jay G. Wilpon,et al.  Considerations in applying clustering techniques to speaker-independent word recognition. , 1979 .

[9]  D. Grémillet,et al.  GPS tracking a marine predator: the effects of precision, resolution and sampling rate on foraging tracks of African Penguins , 2004 .

[10]  Stan Matwin,et al.  Addressing the Curse of Imbalanced Training Sets: One-Sided Selection , 1997, ICML.

[11]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[12]  Seppo Ilmari Fagerlund,et al.  Bird Species Recognition Using Support Vector Machines , 2007, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[13]  Aiko M. Hormann,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning. Part I , 1962, Inf. Control..

[14]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[15]  Jean Rouat,et al.  Robust sound source localization using a microphone array on a mobile robot , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[16]  Peter Knees,et al.  The CoMIRVA Toolkit for Visualizing Music-Related Data , 2007, EuroVis.

[17]  Martine Collard,et al.  Detecting movement patterns with wireless sensor networks: application to bird behavior , 2010, MoMM.

[18]  Lakhdar Benkobi,et al.  Evaluating elk habitat interactions with GPS collars , 2001 .

[19]  Martine Collard,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for social network data collection , 2011, 2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks.