Beyond hydrology in the sustainability assessment of dams: A planners perspective – The Sarawak experience

Summary There is increasing concern about the availability of water supplies in developing countries to provide clean drinking water and sanitation as well as providing for irrigation for food security. This has led to hydrologically led investigation to establish the feasibility and storage capacity of potentially new dam sites. This task has become more difficult for hydrologists and others with the uncertainties created by climate change and the measurement of the hydrological, geographical and ecological footprint of new dams. The questions asked by hydrologists are increasingly likely to be required to be cast in terms of the four pillars of sustainability; environmental, economic, social and institutional. Similarly, regional planners have to be more cognisant of the social outcomes of dam development while understanding the wider hydrological context at a watershed and basin level. The paper defines the concept of sustainability assessment in the context of resettlement and analyses its implications for the Bakun Hydro-electric project in Sarawak, Malaysia. Specifically it attempts to address the question of what social sustainability would really mean in the context of communities affected by dam projects, and their catchments using hermeneutics, tradeoffs and offsets. The findings of this question were presented at a hydrological conference held in Santiago in October 2010, based on the outcome of specific questionnaire responses received from indigenous peoples affected by the Bakun Dam hydroelectric project. The paper also offers some insights pertaining to the social sustainability assessment aspects of dams and their catchments.

[1]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  International Principles For Social Impact Assessment , 2003 .

[2]  J. Altman,et al.  Indigenous interests in land and water , 2009 .

[3]  A. Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Applying sustainability principles in practice: guidance for assessing individual proposals , 2009 .

[4]  Jennifer Pope,et al.  Facing the Gorgon: sustainability assessment and policy learning in Western Australia , 2007 .

[5]  M. Fitzmaurice Contemporary Issues in International Environmental Law , 2009 .

[6]  E. Colson Forced Migration and the Anthropological Response , 2003 .

[7]  E. Colson,et al.  The Social Consequences of Resettlement: The Impact of the Kariba Resettlement Upon the Gwembe Tonga , 1971 .

[8]  Andrea Colantonio,et al.  Social sustainability: linking research to policy and practice , 2009 .

[9]  Hari Mohan Mathur The Future of Large Dams: Dealing with Social, Environmental, Institutional and Political Costs , 2005 .

[10]  Bryan Tilt,et al.  Social impacts of large dam projects: a comparison of international case studies and implications for best practice. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Simin Davoudi,et al.  Planning for a Sustainable Future , 2001 .

[12]  Michael M. Cernea,et al.  The Risks and Reconstruction Model for Resettling Displaced Populations , 1997, Social Development in the World Bank.

[13]  S. Porta,et al.  Linking urban design to sustainability: formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia , 2005 .

[14]  Thayer Scudder,et al.  The Future of Large Dams: Dealing with Social, Environmental, Institutional and Political Costs , 2005 .