Ambient vibration re-testing and operational modal analysis of the Humber Bridge

Abstract An ambient vibration survey of the Humber Bridge was carried out in July 2008 by a combined team from the UK, Portugal and Hong Kong. The exercise had several purposes that included the evaluation of the current technology for instrumentation and system identification and the generation of an experimental dataset of modal properties to be used for validation and updating of finite element models for scenario simulation and structural health monitoring. The exercise was conducted as part of a project aimed at developing online diagnosis capabilities for three landmark European suspension bridges. Ten stand-alone tri-axial acceleration recorders were deployed at locations along all three spans and in all four pylons during five days of consecutive one-hour recordings. Time series segments from the recorders were merged, and several operational modal analysis techniques were used to analyse these data and assemble modal models representing the global behaviour of the bridge in all three dimensions for all components of the structure. The paper describes the equipment and procedures used for the exercise, compares the operational modal analysis (OMA) technology used for system identification and presents modal parameters for key vibration modes of the complete structure. The results obtained using three techniques, natural excitation technique/eigensystem realisation algorithm, stochastic subspace identification and poly-Least Squares Frequency Domain method, are compared among themselves and with those obtained from a 1985 test of the bridge, showing few significant modal parameter changes over 23 years in cases where direct comparison is possible. The measurement system and the much more sophisticated OMA technology used in the present test show clear advantages necessary due to the compressed timescales compared to the earlier exercise. Even so, the parameter estimates exhibit significant variability between different methods and variations of the same method, while also varying in time and having inherent variability.

[1]  Dean S. Carder,et al.  Observed vibrations of bridges , 1937 .

[2]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Study of Time-Domain Techniques for Modal Parameter Identification of a Long Suspension Bridge with Dense Sensor Arrays , 2009 .

[3]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Nonlinear effects in sectional model aeroelastic parameters identification , 1992 .

[4]  Giorgio Diana,et al.  The Aeroelastic Study of the Messina Straits Bridge , 2003 .

[5]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Modal properties of beam-and-block pre-cast floors , 2008 .

[6]  P. Guillaume,et al.  The PolyMAX Frequency-Domain Method: A New Standard for Modal Parameter Estimation? , 2004 .

[7]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification , 2008 .

[8]  J. D. Littler.  Ambient vibration tests on long span suspension bridges , 1992 .

[9]  Richard S. Pappa,et al.  Consistent-Mode Indicator for the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm , 1993 .

[10]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Dynamic Testing of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge , 2008 .

[11]  George S. Vincent.  Golden Gate Bridge Vibration Studies , 1962 .

[12]  G. Roberts,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL MONITORING OF THE HUMBER BRIDGE USING GPS. , 1997 .

[13]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Observed dynamic performance of the Yokohama‐Bay Bridge from system identification using seismic records , 2006 .

[14]  J. B Frandsen,et al.  Simultaneous pressures and accelerations measured full-scale on the Great Belt East suspension bridge , 2001 .

[15]  A Zasso,et al.  USE OF A NEWLY DESIGNED OPTOMETRIC INSTRUMENT FOR LONG-TERM LONG- DISTANCE MONITORING OF STRUCTURES, WITH AN EXAMPLE OF ITS APPLICATION ON THE HUMBER BRIDGE , 1993 .

[16]  Colin Anthony Taylor,et al.  AMBIENT VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS OF THE HUMBER SUSPENSION BRIDGE AND COM PARISON WITH CALCULATED CHARACTERISTICS , 1987 .

[17]  E. Caetano,et al.  DYNAMIC TESTS ON A LARGE CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE AN EFFICIENT APPROACH By , 2000 .

[18]  Hiroshi Katsuchi,et al.  Full-Scale Measurement of Akashi-Kaikyo Bridge during Typhoon , 2001 .

[19]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  VIBRATION STUDIES OF TSING MA SUSPENSION BRIDGE , 1997 .

[20]  Klaus-Jürgen Bathe,et al.  SAP 4: A Structural Analysis Program for Static and Dynamic Response of Linear Systems , 1974 .

[21]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Humber bridge full scale measure campaigns 1990-1991 , 1994 .

[22]  Neil A. Hoult,et al.  Wireless structural health monitoring at the Humber Bridge UK , 2008 .

[23]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Ambient Vibration Studies of Golden Gate Bridge: I. Suspended Structure , 1985 .

[24]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Estimation of damping in suspension bridges , 1994 .

[25]  Shamim N. Pakzad,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Vibration Modes of a Suspension Bridge Using Spatially Dense Wireless Sensor Network , 2009 .

[26]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .

[27]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Ambient vibration survey of the bosporus suspension bridge , 1989 .

[28]  Jer-Nan Juang,et al.  An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. [control systems design for large space structures] , 1985 .

[29]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Seismic analysis of the fatih sultan mehmet (second Bosporus) suspension bridge , 1992 .

[30]  R T Severn,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MODERN SUSPENSION BRIDGES TO ASYNCHRONOUS VERTICAL GROUND MOTION. , 1987 .

[31]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge , 2009 .

[32]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  Deer Isle Bridge: Field and Computed Vibrations , 1989 .

[33]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Measurements of static and dynamic displacement from visual monitoring of the Humber Bridge , 1993 .

[34]  森光 康夫.  地上オイルパイプラインの地震応答(Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics Vol.3 1975) , 1976 .

[35]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Ambient vibration survey of the fatih sultan mehmet (second Bosporus) suspension bridge , 1992 .

[36]  Allan Larsen,et al.  Storebælt suspension bridge – vortex shedding excitation and mitigation by guide vanes , 2000 .

[37]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Modal Testing of Tamar Suspension Bridge , 2006 .

[38]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Suspension bridge parameter identification in full-scale test , 1992 .

[39]  Hong Hao,et al.  Assessment of structural condition of bridges by dynamic measurements , 2001 .

[40]  Mo Shing Cheung,et al.  FIELD MONITORING AND RESEARCH ON PERFORMANCE OF THE CONFEDERATION BRIDGE , 1997 .

[41]  Wenso Lo,et al.  Ground vibration test of a commercial aircraft , 2001 .

[42]  Thomas G. Carne,et al.  Modal parameter extraction from large operating structures using ambient excitation , 1995 .

[43]  Thomas G. Carne,et al.  The Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) for modal parameter extraction from operating wind turbines , 1993 .

[44]  Gianvittorio Rizzano,et al.  Seismic Assessment of Existing RC Frames: Probabilistic Approach , 2009 .

[45]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Ambient Vibration Studies of Golden Gate Bridge , 1985 .

[46]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Online automatic identification of modal parameters of a bridge using the p-LSCF method , 2009 .

[47]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Output-only dynamic testing of bridges and special structures , 2007 .

[48]  Kai-Yuen Wong,et al.  Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable‐supported bridges , 2004 .