Risk, Uncertainty in Risk, and the EPA Release Limits for Radioactive Waste Disposal

A conceptual model for the organization and execution of a performance assessment of a radioactive waste disposal site, including uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, is described. This model is based on a formal definition of risk as a collection of ordered triples, where the first element in each triple is a set of similar occurrences, the second element is the probability or frequency of the first element, and the third element is a vector of consequences associated with the first element. This division of risk into its three constituent parts provides a useful model for the structure of a performance assessment for several reasons. First, it provides a clear distinction between the major parts of a performance assessment. Second, it provides a way to distinguish between different types of uncertainty, including completeness, aggregation, model selection, imprecisely known variables, and stochastic variation. Third, it leads naturally to the representation of stochastic variation with a complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) and the representation of state of knowledge uncertainty with a family or distribution of CCDFs. Fourth, it provides a context in which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency limits for radioactive releases to the accessible environment can be represented and calculated. The preceding ideasmore » are illustrated with results obtained in a preliminary performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in southeastern New Mexico.« less

[1]  C. M. Koplik,et al.  The safety of repositories for highly radioactive wastes , 1982 .

[2]  Benjamin Ross,et al.  Scenarios for repository safety analysis , 1989 .

[3]  R. M. Dudley,et al.  Real Analysis and Probability , 1989 .

[4]  M. G. Marietta,et al.  Preliminary comparison with 40 CFR Part 191, Subpart B for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1990 , 1990 .

[5]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[6]  G. Apostolakis,et al.  Special committee review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's severe accident risks report (NUREG--1150) , 1990 .

[7]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Sensitivity analysis techniques and results for performance assessment at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 1991 .

[8]  M. S. Tierney Combining scenarios in a calculation of the overall probability distribution of cumulative releases of radioactivity from the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, southeastern New Mexico , 1991 .

[9]  C. Voss,et al.  SUTRA (Saturated-Unsaturated Transport). A Finite-Element Simulation Model for Saturated-Unsaturated, Fluid-Density-Dependent Ground-Water Flow with Energy Transport or Chemically-Reactive Single-Species Solute Transport. , 1984 .

[10]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Evaluation of severe accident risks, Peach Bottom, Unit 2: Main report , 1990 .

[11]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  A critique of current practice for the use of expert opinions in probabilistic risk assessment , 1988 .

[12]  G. Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[13]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  FORTRAN 77 program and user's guide for the calculation of partial correlation and standardized regression coefficients , 1985 .

[14]  R M Cranwell,et al.  Performance assessment of radioactive waste repositories. , 1988, Science.

[15]  Robert G. Cochran,et al.  RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT , 1991 .

[16]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  The Repeatability of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses for Complex Probabilistic Risk Assessments , 1991 .

[17]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Expert opinion in risk analysis: the NUREG-1150 methodology , 1989 .

[18]  R. Ash,et al.  Real analysis and probability , 1975 .

[19]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  A FORTRAN-77 PROGRAM AND USER'S GUIDE FOR THE GENERATION OF LATIN HYPERCUBE AND RANDOM SAMPLES FOR USE WITH COMPUTER MODELS , 1984 .