Differential modulation of temporal and frontal components of the somatosensory N140 and the effect of interstimulus interval in a selective attention task.

The modulation of the somatosensory N140 was examined in a selective attention task where a control condition was applied and the interstimulus interval (ISI) was varied. Electrical stimuli were randomly presented to the left index (p=0.4) and middle fingers (p=0.1), and right index (p=0.4) and middle fingers (p=0.1). In the attend-right condition, subjects were instructed to count silently the number of infrequent target stimuli presented to the right middle finger, and to the left middle finger in the attend-left condition. They had no task in the control condition. Each condition was performed with two different sets of ISI (mean 400 vs. 800 ms). The somatosensory N140 elicited by frequent standard stimuli was analyzed. The N140 amplitude was larger for the attended ERP compared to the control and unattended ERPs. This attention effect was more marked at the frontal electrodes compared to the temporal electrodes contralateral to the stimulation side. Furthermore, the attention effect at the frontal electrode was larger when the ISI was 800 ms than when it was 400 ms. The N140 amplitude did not differ between the control and unattended ERPs, which might show that a small processing negativity (PN) occurred during the control condition or difference in vigilance level between them. In conclusion, the early lateral ("temporal") and late midline ("frontal") components of the N1 (N140) show different behavior, and thus may have different functional significance. Enhancement of the attention effect at the frontal electrode in the longer ISI condition supports the hypothesis that it is related to stronger, voluntary maintenance of the attentional trace.

[1]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[2]  R P Lesser,et al.  The second sensory area in humans: Evoked potential and electrical stimulation studies , 1985, Annals of neurology.

[3]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120‐to‐N140 trasition , 1995 .

[4]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Responses of the supra-sylvian (SII) cortex in humans to painful and innocuous stimuli A study using intra-cerebral recordings , 2001, Pain.

[6]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Attention effects on auditory EPs as a function of inter-stimulus interval , 1981, Biological Psychology.

[7]  P. Michie,et al.  Selective Attention Effects on Somatosensory Event‐Related Potentials , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J Driver,et al.  An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[9]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Interstimulus interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs: "N1 enhancement" versus processing negativity. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[10]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: A critical review and reinterpretation , 1979, Biological Psychology.

[12]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: Location and activation timing of SEF sources. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  D Robertson,et al.  Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced‐paced cognitive tasks in man , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Revisiting the oddball paradigm. Non-target vs neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional effects , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  C. Woolsey,et al.  Localization in somatic sensory and motor areas of human cerebral cortex as determined by direct recording of evoked potentials and electrical stimulation. , 1979, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[17]  J. Desmedt,et al.  The search for 'neutral' conditions for recording control event-related potentials in order to assess cognitive components to both irrelevant and relevant stimuli: evidence for short-latency cognitive somatosensory effects. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[18]  C C Wood,et al.  Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. II. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating long-latency activity. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Aicardi,et al.  Atypical presentations of pyridoxine‐dependent seizures: A treatable cause of intractable epilepsy in infants , 1985, Annals of neurology.

[20]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Timing and spatial distribution of somatosensory responses recorded in the upper bank of the sylvian fissure (SII area) in humans. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  R. Hari,et al.  Functional Organization of the Human First and Second Somatosensory Cortices: a Neuromagnetic Study , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  C Tomberg,et al.  Mapping early somatosensory evoked potentials in selective attention: critical evaluation of control conditions used for titrating by difference the cognitive P30, P40, P100 and N140. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  V E Amassian,et al.  Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  C. Shagass,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential changes with a selective attention task. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[25]  H Burton,et al.  Somatotopographic organization in the second somatosensory area of M. fascicularis , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[26]  S Noachtar,et al.  Ipsilateral median somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from human somatosensory cortex. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[28]  C. C. Wood,et al.  The relationship between human long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortical surface and from the scalp. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  P. Michie,et al.  The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. , 1987, Psychophysiology.