The dynamics of technological learning inside the latecomer firm: evidence from the capital goods industry in Brazil

This article focuses on the implications of the intra-firm learning processes for the direction and rate of latecomer firm-level technological capability accumulation. This relationship is examined in a capital goods firm – producer of equipment and complete plants for pulp and paper mills – during its lifetime of 24 years. Using a single case study design, this article draws from first-hand empirical evidence gathered through one-year fieldwork. The framework for capability identifies three technological functions: engineering activities and project management, operational processes and practices, and process equipment. The framework for learning identifies four learning processes. These are examined on the basis of four features: variety, intensity, functioning, and interaction. In addition to clarifying how learning processes work within the latecomer firm, this article contributes to providing a concrete notion of the time-frame to materialise the returns, in terms of innovative capability building, expected by managers from their learning efforts over time.

[1]  Irimá da Silveira.  O setor de bens de capital , 2002 .

[2]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan , 1996, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[3]  John Bessant,et al.  Developing Continuous Improvement Capability , 1998 .

[4]  de Figueiredo,et al.  Technological capability-accumulation paths and the underlying learning processes in the latecomer context : a comparative analysis of two large steel companies in Brazil. , 1999 .

[5]  Toyoda Enterprises.  From Textiles to Automobiles: Mechanical and Organizational Innovation in the , 1996 .

[6]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[7]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[8]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[9]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[10]  Michael Wortmann,et al.  Multinationals and the internationalization of R&D: New developments in German companies☆ , 1990 .

[11]  P. Senge.  The Leader’s New Work: Building Learning Organizations , 2003 .

[12]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[13]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  The Factory as a Learning Laboratory , 2000 .

[14]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Industrial Innovation: Success,Strategy, Trends , 1995 .

[15]  M. Teubal.  The role of technological learning in the exports of manufactured goods: the case of selected capital goods in Brazil , 1984 .

[16]  M. Bell.  ‘Learning’ and the Accumulation of Industrial Technological Capacity in Developing Countries , 1984 .

[17]  Paulo N. Figueiredo,et al.  Does technological learning pay off? Inter-firm differences in technological capability-accumulation paths and operational performance improvement , 2002 .

[18]  L. Kim.  The Dynamics of Samsung's Technological Learning in Semiconductors , 1997 .

[19]  Samuel Hollander,et al.  The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of DuPont Rayon Plants , 1965 .

[20]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[21]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites , 1990 .

[22]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[23]  S. Albers,et al.  Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-Up at Hyundai Motor , 1998 .

[24]  G. Babu.  The Determinants of Firm-level Technological Performances - A Study on the Indian Capital Goods Sector , 1999 .

[25]  P. N. Figueiredo.  Technological Learning and Competitive Performance , 2001 .

[26]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Key Characteristics of the Large Innovating Firm , 1991 .

[27]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[28]  D. Garvin.  Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[29]  Tony S. Frost.  Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning , 1997 .

[30]  M. Cimoli,et al.  Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: a Latin American perspective , 2003 .

[31]  Boris Magnusson,et al.  Technology integration , 1996, CSUR.

[32]  Martin Bell,et al.  Firms, politics and political economy: patterns of subsidiary-parent linkages and technological capacity-building in electronics TNC subsidiaries in Malaysia , 1999 .

[33]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[34]  Norlela Ariffin,et al.  Internationalization of innovative capabilities: counter‐evidence from the electronics industry in Malaysia and Brazil , 2004 .

[35]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Educational statistics as an indicator of technological activity , 1995 .

[36]  S. Lall.  Technological capabilities and industrialization , 1992 .

[37]  Paulo N. Figueiredo,et al.  Learning, capability accumulation and firms differences: evidence from latecomer steel , 2003 .

[38]  Howard Pack.  Productivity, Technology, and Industrial Development: A Case Study in Textiles , 1987 .

[39]  Masaru Yarime,et al.  Technology Trends in Pollution-Intensive Industries: A Review of Sectoral Trends , 1997 .

[40]  Gabriela Dutrénit,et al.  Learning and Knowledge Management in the Firm: From Knowledge Accumulation to Strategic Capabilities , 2000 .

[41]  D. Teece,et al.  Overseas Research and Development by US-Based Firms , 1979 .

[42]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .