The Choice of Reference Sites for Seismic Ground Amplification Analyses: Case Study at Parkway, New Zealand

This article focuses on how close reference rock sites need to be to the sites of interest when using the standard spectral ratio technique to obtain consistent estimates of site amplifications reflecting behavior of seismic waves at the sites of interest. Taber and Smith (1992) and Chavez-Garcia et al. (1999) obtained very different amplification factors for the Parkway Basin, New Zealand, using reference sites only 2 km apart. We analyze 34 earthquakes recorded by a dense 2D array of 19 soil sites in the basin and 4 rock sites fringing the basin. Spectral ratios are calculated separately relative to Taber and Smith9s reference site P01, 2 km from the basin, and to a hypothetical average rock site, PR, formed from the four local rock sites, including reference site P25 of Chavez-Garcia et al. Our spectral ratios of the soil sites relative to PR are remarkably consistent, with a distribution of the dominant peaks at 8.4 ± 2.0 at 1.7 ± 0.3 Hz. In contrast, the spectral ratios relative to P01 are much less consistent, and the dominant peak ratios are widely scattered around two separate centers of 14.5 ± 4.1 at 1.8 ± 0.3 Hz and 14.4 ± 5.5 at 4.7 ± 1.0 Hz. Our results relative to the two references are similar to those obtained by Chavez-Garcia et al. and Taber and Smith, respectively. We find that extreme differences between the two are often associated with the occurrence of troughs in the amplitude spectra at P01, possibly due to topographic deamplification there relative to the Parkway Basin in some but not all earthquakes.

[1]  A. Haines A local magnitude scale for New Zealand earthquakes , 1981 .

[2]  Edward H. Field,et al.  A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent , 1995 .

[3]  Y Nakamura,et al.  A METHOD FOR DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATION OF SUBSURFACE USING MICROTREMOR ON THE GROUND SURFACE , 1989 .

[4]  William R. Stephenson,et al.  Lateral propagation effects observed at Parkway, New Zealand. A case history to compare 1D versus 2D site effects , 1999 .

[5]  P. Bard,et al.  Detailed evaluation of site-response estimation methods across and along the sedimentary valley of volvi (EURO-SEISTEST) , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  Pierre-Yves Bard,et al.  Site effects and microzonation in the city of Thessaloniki (Greece) comparison of different approaches , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Jon B. Fletcher,et al.  A general inversion scheme for source, site, and propagation characteristics using multiply recorded sets of moderate-sized earthquakes , 1991 .

[8]  F. Luzón,et al.  On the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio in Sedimentary Basins , 2000 .

[9]  Jamison H. Steidl,et al.  What is a reference site? , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  R. Borcherdt Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay , 1970 .

[11]  Jamison H. Steidl,et al.  Site amplification in the San Fernando Valley, California: Variability of site-effect estimation using the S-wave, coda, and H/V methods , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  R. Herrmann,et al.  Explosion, earthquake, and ambient noise recordings in a Pliocene sediment-filled valley: Inferences on seismic response properties by reference- and non-reference-site techniques , 1996 .

[13]  Jiashun Yu,et al.  The Wainuiomata local effects seismograph network , 2002 .