Speech acts meet tagging: NiceTag ontology

Current tag models do not fully take into account the rich and diverse nature of tags. Each model makes different partial assumptions as to the definition and attributes a tag should receive. In this paper we propose an ontology, NiceTag, whose primitives are "tag actions" modeled with RDF named graphs. This mechanism allows us to type, describe and thus ensure the traceability of each single act of tagging. Our named graphs contain at least a resource linked to a "sign", which can be any resource reachable on the Web (an ontology concept, an image, etc.). The resource, the sign and the link between them are the three components of the acts of tagging that we want to explicitly represent as social actions, akin to speech acts. The purpose of our model is threefold. First, to be able to describe acts of tagging in a very precise and general manner, consistent with the principles behind the architecture of the Web. To reconcile and bridge existing tag models (Newman ontology, Tagont, ES, SCOT, SIOC, CommonTag, MOAT, NAO). And finally, to propose a viable way to reify and represent the intention behind an act of tagging and leverage its semantics.

[1]  Dale Gottlieb No Entity Without Identity , 1978 .

[2]  Alexandre Passant,et al.  Meaning Of A Tag: A collaborative approach to bridge the gap between tagging and Linked Data , 2008, LDOW.

[3]  Bart Selman,et al.  The state of SAT , 2007, Discret. Appl. Math..

[4]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Identity of Resources and Entities on the Web , 2008, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[5]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[6]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[7]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in knowledge via quasi-classical models , 2002, AAAI/IAAI.

[8]  Tobias Schwarz,et al.  In defense of ambiguity. , 2007, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[9]  Olivier Corby,et al.  RDF/XML Source Declaration , 2007 .

[10]  Valentina Presutti,et al.  An Ontology of Resources: Solving the Identity Crisis , 2009, ESWC.

[11]  Georg Gottlob,et al.  On the Complexity of Propositional Knowledge Base Revision, Updates, and Counterfactuals , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[12]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Review and Alignment of Tag Ontologies for Semantically-Linked Data in Collaborative Tagging Spaces , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.

[13]  V. S. Subrahmanian,et al.  How Dirty Is Your Relational Database? An Axiomatic Approach , 2007, ECSQARU.

[14]  Xiaotie Deng,et al.  On the Complexity of Cooperative Solution Concepts , 1994, Math. Oper. Res..

[15]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Logical Comparison of Inconsistent Perspectives using Scoring Functions , 2004, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[16]  John Grant,et al.  Classifications for inconsistent theories , 1978, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[17]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Patrick J. Hayes,et al.  In Defense of Ambiguity , 2008, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[19]  Marco Schaerf,et al.  Tractable Reasoning via Approximation , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[20]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  A Logic of Implicit and Explicit Belief , 1984, AAAI.

[21]  John Grant,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in knowledgebases , 2006, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[22]  John Riedl,et al.  tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution , 2006, CSCW '06.

[23]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Evaluating Significance of Inconsistencies , 2003, IJCAI.

[24]  Ying Ding,et al.  Proceedings of the 4th Asian Conference on The Semantic Web , 2009 .

[25]  Philippe Besnard,et al.  Paraconsistent Reasoning as an Analytic Tool , 2001, Log. J. IGPL.

[26]  Alexandre Monnin From Game Neverending to Flickr. Tagging systems as ludic systems and their consequences. , 2009 .

[27]  Kevin M. Knight,et al.  Two Information Measures for Inconsistent Sets , 2003, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[28]  Leopoldo E. Bertossi,et al.  Consistent Query Answers in Virtual Data Integration Systems , 2005, Inconsistency Tolerance.

[29]  Eliezer L. Lozinskii,et al.  Information and evidence in logic systems , 1994, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[30]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Towards an OWL Ontology for Identity on the Web , 2006, SWAP.

[31]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Managing inconsistent specifications: reasoning, analysis, and action , 1998, TSEM.

[32]  Torsten Schaub,et al.  Introduction to Inconsistency Tolerance , 2005, Inconsistency Tolerance.

[33]  Jeremy J. Carroll,et al.  Named graphs, provenance and trust , 2005, WWW '05.

[34]  Anthony Hunter How to act on inconsistent news: Ignore, resolve, or reject , 2006, Data Knowl. Eng..

[35]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  A Grounded Ontology for Identity and Reference of Web Resources , 2007, I3.

[36]  Fabien Gandon,et al.  Helping online communities to semantically enrich folksonomies , 2010 .

[37]  Frédéric Koriche,et al.  Approximate coherence-based reasoning , 2002, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[38]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Approaches to Measuring Inconsistent Information , 2005, Inconsistency Tolerance.

[39]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  The bourne identity of a web resource , 2006 .

[40]  Ying Ding,et al.  Mediating and Analyzing Social Data , 2008, OTM Conferences.

[41]  Weiru Liu,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in requirements engineering , 2005 .

[42]  Vassilios Peristeras,et al.  An Annotation-Based Access Control Model and Tools for Collaborative Information Spaces , 2008, WSKS.

[43]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Naming and Necessity , 1980 .

[44]  Fabien Gandon,et al.  NiceTag Ontology: tags as named graphs , 2009 .

[45]  Alan Mcginnis,et al.  THE KILLER APPLICATION , 2003 .

[46]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Debugging unsatisfiable classes in OWL ontologies , 2005, J. Web Semant..

[47]  Guilin Qi,et al.  Measuring Inconsistency for Description Logics Based on Paraconsistent Semantics , 2007, Description Logics.

[48]  A. Hunter,et al.  Shapley Inconsistency Values , 2006, KR.

[49]  J. Saul,et al.  Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. , 1993 .

[50]  Bijan Parsia,et al.  Debugging OWL ontologies , 2005, WWW '05.

[51]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games And Decisions , 1958 .

[52]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Providing Access Control to Online Photo Albums Based on Tags and Linked Data , 2009, AAAI Spring Symposium: Social Semantic Web: Where Web 2.0 Meets Web 3.0.

[53]  John G. Breslin,et al.  The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies , 2008, Dublin Core Conference.

[54]  Fabien L. Gandon,et al.  L'ontologie NiceTag : les tags en tant que graphes nommés , 2010 .

[55]  Guilin Qi,et al.  Measuring Incoherence in Description Logic-Based Ontologies , 2007, ISWC/ASWC.

[56]  Guilin Qi,et al.  Measuring conflict and agreement between two prioritized belief bases , 2005, IJCAI.

[57]  Éric Grégoire,et al.  Boosting a Complete Technique to Find MSS and MUS Thanks to a Local Search Oracle , 2007, IJCAI.

[58]  Harry Halpin,et al.  Web Proper Names: Naming Referents on the Web , 2005 .