Reducing patient delay with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome: a research protocol for a systematic review of previous interventions to investigate which behaviour change techniques are associated with effective interventions

Introduction Delay to presentation with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is common meaning many fail to achieve optimal benefit from treatments. Interventions have had variable success in reducing delay. Evidence suggests inclusion of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) may improve effectiveness of interventions but this has not yet been systematically evaluated. Data from other time-critical conditions may be relevant. Methods and analysis A systematic review will be undertaken to identify which BCTs are associated with effective interventions to reduce patient delay (or prompt rapid help-seeking) among people with time-critical conditions (eg, chest pain, ACS, lumps, stroke, cancer and meningitis). A systematic search of a wide range of databases (including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo) and grey literature will be undertaken to identify all relevant intervention studies (randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and cohort studies). Two independent reviewers will screen abstracts to identify relevant studies, apply inclusion criteria to full papers, assess methodological quality and extract data. Primary outcome measure Change in patient decision time BCTs reported in each of the included studies will be categorised and presented according to the latest reliable taxonomy. Results of included studies will be synthesised, exploring relationships between inclusion of each BCT and effectiveness of the overall intervention. Where possible, means and SDs for differences in delay time will be calculated and combined within meta-analyses to derive a standardised mean difference and 95% CI. Analysis of (1) all time-critical and (2) ACS-only interventions will be undertaken. Ethics and dissemination No ethical issues are anticipated. Results will be submitted for publication in a relevant peer-reviewed journal.

[1]  D. Moser,et al.  Slow-onset and fast-onset symptom presentations in acute coronary syndrome (ACS): new perspectives on prehospital delay in patients with ACS. , 2014, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[2]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  C. Abraham,et al.  The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[4]  Jatinder Singh,et al.  Critical appraisal skills programme , 2013 .

[5]  S. Wyke,et al.  Reducing time before consulting with symptoms of lung cancer: randomised controlled trial , 2013 .

[6]  S. Wyke,et al.  Reducing the time before consulting with symptoms of lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial in primary care. , 2013, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[7]  S. Wyke,et al.  Developing a complex intervention to reduce time to presentation with symptoms of lung cancer. , 2012, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  P. Janský,et al.  Pre-hospital treatment of STEMI patients. A scientific statement of the Working Group Acute Cardiac Care of the European Society of Cardiology , 2011, Acute cardiac care.

[9]  J. Higgins Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[10]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMC medicine.

[11]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[12]  S. Michie,et al.  Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  E. Bradley,et al.  Patient education to reduce prehospital delay time in acute coronary syndrome: necessary but not sufficient. , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[14]  Steven M. Paul,et al.  A Randomized Clinical Trial to Reduce Patient Prehospital Delay to Treatment in Acute Coronary Syndrome , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[15]  M. Carey,et al.  Predictors of pre-hospital delay among patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[16]  J. Gurwitz,et al.  Trends in prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction (from the Worcester Heart Attack Study). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  M. Johnston,et al.  From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques , 2008 .

[18]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies , 2008 .

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies , 2008 .

[21]  Andrew Cole,et al.  Cancer expert doubts claims about prostate cancer trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  C. Abraham,et al.  A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[23]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patie , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  A. Farmer,et al.  Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  I. Hozo,et al.  Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[26]  A. Sowden,et al.  Systematic review of interventions to reduce delay in patients with suspected heart attack , 2004, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[27]  D. Moser,et al.  An international perspective on the time to treatment for acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[28]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) , 2002, The Lancet.

[31]  R. Califf,et al.  Persistence of delays in presentation and treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction: The GUSTO-I and GUSTO-III experience. , 2002, Annals of emergency medicine.

[32]  K. Fox,et al.  Psychological factors associated with delay in attending hospital following a myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[33]  J. Gore,et al.  Decade-long trends and factors associated with time to hospital presentation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the Worcester Heart Attack study. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[34]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  H A Feldman,et al.  Effect of a community intervention on patient delay and emergency medical service use in acute coronary heart disease: The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Trial. , 2000, JAMA.

[36]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Detecting skewness from summary information , 1996, BMJ.

[37]  F. Balestra,et al.  Epidemiology of avoidable delay in the care of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Italy. A GISSI-generated study. GISSI--Avoidable Delay Study Group. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[38]  F. Avanzini,et al.  Antiarrhythmic drug prescription in patients after myocardial infarction in the last decade. Experience of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto miocardico (GISSI). , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.