A photon recycling approach to the denoising of ultra-low dose X-ray sequences

PurposeClinical procedures that make use of fluoroscopy may expose patients as well as the clinical staff (throughout their career) to non-negligible doses of radiation. The potential consequences of such exposures fall under two categories, namely stochastic (mostly cancer) and deterministic risks (skin injury). According to the “as low as reasonably achievable” principle, the radiation dose can be lowered only if the necessary image quality can be maintained.MethodsOur work improves upon the existing patch-based denoising algorithms by utilizing a more sophisticated noise model to exploit non-local self-similarity better and this in turn improves the performance of low-rank approximation. The novelty of the proposed approach lies in its properly designed and parameterized noise model and the elimination of initial estimates. This reduces the computational cost significantly.ResultsThe algorithm has been evaluated on 500 clinical images (7 patients, 20 sequences, 3 clinical sites), taken at ultra-low dose levels, i.e. 50% of the standard low dose level, during electrophysiology procedures. An average improvement in the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) by a factor of around 3.5 has been found. This is associated with an image quality achieved at around 12 (square of 3.5) times the ultra-low dose level. Qualitative evaluation by X-ray image quality experts suggests that the method produces denoised images that comply with the required image quality criteria.ConclusionThe results are consistent with the number of patches used, and they demonstrate that it is possible to use motion estimation techniques and “recycle” photons from previous frames to improve the image quality of the current frame. Our results are comparable in terms of CNR to Video Block Matching 3D—a state-of-the-art denoising method. But qualitative analysis by experts confirms that the denoised ultra-low dose X-ray images obtained using our method are more realistic with respect to appearance.

[1]  Amit Singer,et al.  Non-Local Euclidean Medians , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[2]  Moon Gi Kang,et al.  Motion-adaptive 3D nonlocal means filter based on stochastic distance for low-dose X-ray fluoroscopy , 2017, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[3]  Stefan Roth,et al.  Shrinkage Fields for Effective Image Restoration , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[4]  Marc Lebrun,et al.  An Implementation and Detailed Analysis of the K-SVD Image Denoising Algorithm , 2012, Image Process. Line.

[5]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  A comparison of denoising methods for X-ray fluoroscopic images , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[6]  Evgin Goceri,et al.  Quantitative validation of anti‐PTBP1 antibody for diagnostic neuropathology use: Image analysis approach , 2017, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[7]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Video denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering , 2007, 2007 15th European Signal Processing Conference.

[8]  Michel Desvignes,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Multiscale Denoising of Fluoroscopic Sequence , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Caiming Zhang,et al.  Patch Grouping SVD-Based Denoising Aggregation Patch Grouping SVD-Based Denoising Aggregation Back Projection Noisy Image , 2015 .

[10]  Yunjin Chen,et al.  Trainable Nonlinear Reaction Diffusion: A Flexible Framework for Fast and Effective Image Restoration , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Thierry Blu,et al.  SURE-LET for Orthonormal Wavelet-Domain Video Denoising , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[12]  Hanno Scharr,et al.  A Scheme for Coherence-Enhancing Diffusion Filtering with Optimized Rotation Invariance , 2002, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[13]  Boracchi Giacomo,et al.  Multiframe Raw-Data Denoising Based On Block-Matching And 3-D Filtering For Low-Light Imaging And Stabilization , 2008 .

[14]  Kai Yang,et al.  Noise variance analysis using a flat panel x-ray detector: a method for additive noise assessment with application to breast CT applications. , 2010, Medical physics.

[15]  Sebastian Schafer,et al.  Noise reduction for curve-linear structures in real time fluoroscopy applications using directional binary masks. , 2015, Medical physics.

[16]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Optimal Inversion of the Generalized Anscombe Transformation for Poisson-Gaussian Noise , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[19]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Photon-limited image denoising by inference on multiscale models , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[20]  S L Fritz,et al.  Phantom evaluation of angiographer performance using low frame rate acquisition fluoroscopy. , 1988, Medical physics.

[21]  Shadi Albarqouni,et al.  Multi-scale Graph-based Guided Filter for De-noising Cryo-Electron Tomographic Data , 2015, BMVC.

[22]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Kostadin Dabov,et al.  BM3D Image Denoising with Shape-Adaptive Principal Component Analysis , 2009 .

[24]  Paul D. Clayton,et al.  Optimal Dose Utilization With Variable X-Ray Intensity In Digital Radiography , 1983, Other Conferences.