Resource-consumer models and the biomass conversion principle

Abstract In the search for a unified basis for constructing food-web models, the long-standing discrepancy between biomass conversion (BC) and individual survival (IS) modeling has been revitalized by Ginzburg (J. Anim. Ecol. 67 (1998) 325) and Berryman (J. Anim. Ecol. 68 (1999) 1263) in the context of resource–consumer interactions. In this work, the principles underlying the confronting approaches are summarized and the criticisms addressed against each. Also, it is argued that the achievement of a single theory of resource–consumer ecology could benefit from this debate by incorporating key elements of both approaches. A logical procedure is suggested to build simple continuous resource–consumer models that follow the principle of biomass conversion, possess structural homogeneity, and distinguish the effects of depletable and fixed resource availability. Additionally, a new conversion function and a general Holling type extraction function (functional response) are introduced. Finally, it is shown that some well known IS models can be obtained as special cases of a general BC model.

[1]  L. Ginzburg,et al.  The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  S. Levin.  Lectu re Notes in Biomathematics , 1983 .

[3]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A MODEL FOR TROPHIC INTERACTION , 1975 .

[4]  Lev R. Ginzburg,et al.  Assuming reproduction to be a function of consumption raises doubts about some popular predator–prey models , 1998 .

[5]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  Alan A. Berryman,et al.  Alternative perspectives on consumer–resource dynamics: a reply to Ginzburg , 1999 .

[7]  P. H. Leslie.  SOME FURTHER NOTES ON THE USE OF MATRICES IN POPULATION MATHEMATICS , 1948 .

[8]  S. Gleeson.  Density Dependence is Better Than Ratio Dependence , 1994 .

[9]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A Model for Tropic Interaction , 1975 .

[10]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  A UNIFIED APPROACH TO MULTISPECIES MODELING , 1991 .

[11]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  The Fallacies of "Ratio‐Dependent" Predation , 1994 .

[12]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  STABILITY AND COMPLEXITY IN MODEL ECOSYSTEMS , 1974 .

[13]  M. Rosenzweig.  Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[14]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical Ecology , 1989 .

[15]  R. Arditi,et al.  Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-Dependence , 1989 .

[16]  Robert M. May,et al.  Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications , 1981 .

[17]  Rodrigo Ramos-Jiliberto,et al.  Relating behavior to population dynamics: a predator–prey metaphysiological model emphasizing zooplankton diel vertical migration as an inducible response , 2000 .

[18]  Peter J. Wangersky,et al.  Lotka-Volterra Population Models , 1978 .

[19]  R. Ramos‐Jiliberto.  Population dynamics of prey exhibiting inducible defenses: the role of associated costs and density-dependence. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  A Metaphysiological Approach to Modeling Ecological Populations and Communities , 1994 .

[21]  C. S. Holling.  The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[22]  M. Saunders,et al.  Plant-Provided Food for Carnivorous Insects: a Protective Mutualism and Its Applications , 2009 .

[23]  R. Arditi,et al.  Logistic Theory of Food Web Dynamics , 1995 .

[24]  O. Sarnelle.  Inferring Process from Pattern: Trophic Level Abundances and Imbedded Interactions , 1994 .

[25]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Frontiers in Mathematical Biology , 1995 .

[26]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  Population Dynamics: a per capita Resource Approach , 1984 .

[27]  Jonathan M. Jeschke,et al.  PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY , 2002 .

[28]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  Metaphysiological and evolutionary dynamics of populations exploiting constant and interactive resources:R—K selection revisited , 1993, Evolutionary Ecology.

[29]  Alan A. Berryman,et al.  The Orgins and Evolution of Predator‐Prey Theory , 1992 .

[30]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Global models of growth and competition. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.