in the Smart City

If we think of the smart city as a reading environment, we can use it to change what it means to be a citizen, to improve how public topics are addressed, and to democratize how decisions are made. The starting point is text, supplemented with the various other kinds of data that can be gathered through digital means. In this chapter, we discuss two experimental platforms that take different approaches. First is the Data Stories project, where we have been sequencing text from various dynamic sources through a thematic clustering algorithm (Latent Dirichlet Allocation), feeding those thematic clusters into a narrative generator, then putting those results into a storyboarding system. Using the output, we can examine patterns emerging from a variety of text streams, such as Twitter, Facebook, news feeds, and so on. More importantly, however, we can allow people to manipulate the parameters, so that using the same text stream can produce multiple simultaneous valid outputs, depending on the perspective that the reader wishes to take on the feed. Providing a method for encouraging this kind of interpretive or hermeneutic inquiry is a promising strategy for supporting civil discourse. Our second project, Conversational Modeling, is building on previous research to investigate the various ways in which discussions, which occur sequentially through time, can be profitably modeled as 3-D objects of various kinds. These models can subsequently be used for recollection, communication, and analysis, but they may also have a generative potential. As a means of dealing with the structure and substance of discussions in civil society, we propose that conversational modeling has the potential to radically alter our understanding and practice of citizenship.

[1]  Stéfan Sinclair,et al.  Visualizing Theatrical Text: From Watching the Script to the Simulated Environment for Theatre (SET) , 2013, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[2]  S. Sitkin,et al.  A dual-capacity model of communication media choice in organizations , 1992 .

[3]  Edgar Allan Poe,et al.  A Descent into the Maelström , 1841 .

[4]  Federico Peinado,et al.  Evaluation of automatic generation of basic stories , 2006, New Generation Computing.

[5]  David Huard,et al.  PyMC: Bayesian Stochastic Modelling in Python. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[6]  Gordon Pask,et al.  CONVERSATIONAL TECHNIQUES IN THE STUDY AND PRACTICE OF EDUCATION , 1976 .

[7]  Steven Ross An Experiment with a Narrative Discourse Test. , 1987 .

[8]  R. N. Woolley On Becoming a Personal Scientis , 1982 .

[9]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Event schemas, story schemas, and story grammars , 1980 .

[10]  T. Butt George Kelly. The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2009, History & Philosophy of Psychology.

[11]  Stefano Ghislotti,et al.  Narrative Comprehension Made Difficult: Film Form and Mnemonic Devices in Memento , 2009 .

[12]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  L. D. Richards Connecting Radical Constructivism to Social Transformation and Design , 2007 .

[14]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Stephen Denning,et al.  The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations , 2000 .

[17]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[18]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Making Sense of Stories: A Rhetorical Approach to Narrative Analysis , 2002 .

[19]  P. Carrell The Effects of Rhetorical Organization on ESL Readers. , 1984 .