Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities

Numerous current efforts seek to improve the representation of ecosystem ecology and vegetation demographic processes within Earth System Models (ESMs). These developments are widely viewed as an important step in developing greater realism in predictions of future ecosystem states and fluxes. Increased realism, however, leads to increased model complexity, with new features raising a suite of ecological questions that require empirical constraints. Here, we review the developments that permit the representation of plant demographics in ESMs, and identify issues raised by these developments that highlight important gaps in ecological understanding. These issues inevitably translate into uncertainty in model projections but also allow models to be applied to new processes and questions concerning the dynamics of real‐world ecosystems. We argue that stronger and more innovative connections to data, across the range of scales considered, are required to address these gaps in understanding. The development of first‐generation land surface models as a unifying framework for ecophysiological understanding stimulated much research into plant physiological traits and gas exchange. Constraining predictions at ecologically relevant spatial and temporal scales will require a similar investment of effort and intensified inter‐disciplinary communication.

[1]  One-Dimensional Model , 2020, Beyond Global Warming.

[2]  M. Dietze,et al.  Forest Simulators , 2019, Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology.

[3]  Timothy K. Nguyen,et al.  Taking off the Training Wheels. , 2019, Practical radiation oncology.

[4]  S. Pacala,et al.  Predicting vegetation type through physiological and environmental interactions with leaf traits: evergreen and deciduous forests in an earth system modeling framework , 2017, Global change biology.

[5]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  Predicting stomatal responses to the environment from the optimization of photosynthetic gain and hydraulic cost. , 2017, Plant, cell & environment.

[6]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Scale dependence of canopy trait distributions along a tropical forest elevation gradient. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[7]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Contrasting strategies of hydraulic control in two codominant temperate tree species , 2017 .

[8]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Global variations in ecosystem‐scale isohydricity , 2017, Global change biology.

[9]  Mark C. Vanderwel,et al.  Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes , 2016, Global change biology.

[10]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  High-resolution global maps of 21st-century annual forest loss: Independent accuracy assessment and application in a temperate forest region of Atlantic Canada , 2017 .

[11]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  Beyond 3-D: The New Spectrum of Lidar Applications for Earth and Ecological Sciences , 2016 .

[12]  David Galbraith,et al.  Linking hydraulic traits to tropical forest function in a size-structured and trait-driven model (TFS v.1-Hydro) , 2016 .

[13]  David Medvigy,et al.  Diversity in plant hydraulic traits explains seasonal and inter-annual variations of vegetation dynamics in seasonally dry tropical forests. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[14]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Quantifying the influences of spectral resolution on uncertainty in leaf trait estimates through a Bayesian approach to RTM inversion , 2016 .

[15]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6:rationale and experimental design , 2016 .

[16]  D. Medvigy,et al.  Climate, soil organic layer, and nitrogen jointly drive forest development after fire in the North American boreal zone , 2016 .

[17]  Luis Guanter,et al.  Recent advances in global monitoring of terrestrial sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[18]  R. Kadmon,et al.  Size asymmetry of resource competition and the structure of plant communities , 2016 .

[19]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  The status and challenge of global fire modelling , 2016 .

[20]  H. Tian,et al.  Carbon and energy fluxes in cropland ecosystems: a model-data comparison , 2016, Biogeochemistry.

[21]  Ke Zhang,et al.  Variation in stem mortality rates determines patterns of above‐ground biomass in Amazonian forests: implications for dynamic global vegetation models , 2016, Global change biology.

[22]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  2016 International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMB) Workshop Report , 2016 .

[23]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Lessons learned from applying a forest gap model to understand ecosystem and carbon dynamics of complex tropical forests , 2016 .

[24]  R. Q. Thomas,et al.  The Impact of Fine-Scale Disturbances on the Predictability of Vegetation Dynamics and Carbon Flux , 2016, PloS one.

[25]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP): Rationale and experimental design , 2016 .

[26]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  An allometry‐based model of the survival strategies of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation , 2016 .

[27]  J. Chave,et al.  Causes of variation in leaf-level drought tolerance within an Amazonian forest , 2016 .

[28]  Stephanie A. Bohlman,et al.  Dominance of the suppressed: Power-law size structure in tropical forests , 2016, Science.

[29]  M. Hansen,et al.  Potential Vegetation and Carbon Redistribution in Northern North America from Climate Change , 2016 .

[30]  M. Dietze,et al.  Alteration of forest succession and carbon cycling under elevated CO2 , 2016, Global change biology.

[31]  Christoforos Pappas,et al.  Modeling terrestrial carbon and water dynamics across climatic gradients: does plant trait diversity matter? , 2016, The New phytologist.

[32]  Ülo Niinemets,et al.  Global leaf trait estimates biased due to plasticity in the shade , 2016, Nature Plants.

[33]  Ke Zhang,et al.  Ecosystem heterogeneity determines the ecological resilience of the Amazon to climate change , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Marcos Longo,et al.  Future deforestation in the Amazon and consequences for South American climate , 2015 .

[35]  Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry,et al.  Amazon forest structure generates diurnal and seasonal variability in light utilization , 2015 .

[36]  Clayton C. Kingdon,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  Nate G. McDowell,et al.  Taking off the training wheels: the properties of a dynamic vegetation model without climate envelopes, CLM4.5(ED) , 2015 .

[38]  Julia E. M. S. Nabel,et al.  Upscaling with the dynamic two-layer classification concept (D2C): TreeMig-2L, an efficient implementation of the forest-landscape model TreeMig , 2015 .

[39]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  The fourth phase of the radiative transfer model intercomparison (RAMI) exercise: Actual canopy scenarios and conformity testing , 2015 .

[40]  N. McDowell,et al.  Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide , 2015, Nature Plants.

[41]  Clayton C. Kingdon,et al.  Remotely estimating photosynthetic capacity, and its response to temperature, in vegetation canopies using imaging spectroscopy , 2015 .

[42]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Controls on terrestrial carbon feedbacks by productivity versus turnover in the CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2015 .

[43]  S. Higgins,et al.  Potential impact of large ungulate grazers on African vegetation, carbon storage and fire regimes , 2015 .

[44]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Observations of stem water storage in trees of opposing hydraulic strategies , 2015 .

[45]  N. McDowell,et al.  Interdependence of chronic hydraulic dysfunction and canopy processes can improve integrated models of tree response to drought , 2015 .

[46]  Jens Kattge,et al.  Inclusion of ecologically based trait variation in plant functional types reduces the projected land carbon sink in an earth system model , 2015, Global change biology.

[47]  Reto Knutti,et al.  A Representative Democracy to Reduce Interdependency in a Multimodel Ensemble , 2015 .

[48]  Anja Rammig,et al.  Leaf and stem economics spectra drive diversity of functional plant traits in a dynamic global vegetation model , 2015, Global change biology.

[49]  Marcos Longo,et al.  Linking canopy leaf area and light environments with tree size distributions to explain Amazon forest demography. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[50]  J. Sperry,et al.  What plant hydraulics can tell us about responses to climate-change droughts. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[51]  Joe R. Melton,et al.  Competition between plant functional types in the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) v. 2.0 , 2015 .

[52]  Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe,et al.  Decreased water limitation under elevated CO2 amplifies potential for forest carbon sinks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  S. Malyshev,et al.  Scaling from individual trees to forests in an Earth system modeling framework using a mathematically tractable model of height-structured competition , 2015 .

[54]  R. Q. Thomas,et al.  Nitrogen limitation on land: how can it occur in Earth system models? , 2015, Global change biology.

[55]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Tree mortality predicted from drought-induced vascular damage , 2015 .

[56]  E. Hansis,et al.  Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes , 2015 .

[57]  P. Campanello,et al.  Water storage dynamics in the main stem of subtropical tree species differing in wood density, growth rate and life history traits. , 2015, Tree physiology.

[58]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Spatial variability in tropical forest leaf area density from multireturn lidar and modeling , 2015 .

[59]  Amanda M. Schwantes,et al.  Global satellite monitoring of climate-induced vegetation disturbances. , 2015, Trends in plant science.

[60]  R. Bras,et al.  Hydrometeorological effects of historical land-conversion in an ecosystem-atmosphere model of Northern South America , 2015 .

[61]  Ke Zhang,et al.  The fate of Amazonian ecosystems over the coming century arising from changes in climate, atmospheric CO2, and land use , 2015, Global change biology.

[62]  J. Fisk NET EFFECTS OF DISTURBANCE: SPATIAL, TEMPORAL, AND SOCIETAL DIMENSIONS OF FOREST DISTURBANCE AND RECOVERY ON TERRESTRIAL CARBON BALANCE , 2015 .

[63]  Joe R. Melton,et al.  The sensitivity of simulated competition between different plant functional types to subgrid‐scale representation of vegetation in a land surface model , 2014 .

[64]  H. Shugart,et al.  Testing individual-based models of forest dynamics: Issues and an example from the boreal forests of Russia , 2014 .

[65]  Jean-Christophe Calvet,et al.  Predicting the response of the Amazon rainforest to persistent drought conditions under current and future climates: a major challenge for global land surface models , 2014 .

[66]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  A vertically discretised canopy description for ORCHIDEE (SVN r2290) and the modifications to the energy, water and carbon fluxes , 2014 .

[67]  B. Hurk,et al.  Contribution of Dynamic Vegetation Phenology to Decadal Climate Predictability , 2014 .

[68]  K. Oleson,et al.  Modeling stomatal conductance in the earth system: linking leaf water-use efficiency and water transport along the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum , 2014 .

[69]  P. Reich,et al.  Biogeographic variation in evergreen conifer needle longevity and impacts on boreal forest carbon cycle projections , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Thomas Raddatz,et al.  Comparing the influence of net and gross anthropogenic land-use and land-cover changes on the carbon cycle in the MPI-ESM , 2014 .

[71]  M. Dietze,et al.  A general ecophysiological framework for modelling the impact of pests and pathogens on forest ecosystems. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[72]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  A stand-alone tree demography and landscape structure module for Earth system models: integration with inventory data from temperate and boreal forests , 2014 .

[73]  J. Fisher,et al.  Modeling the carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: Mycorrhizal trade‐offs and multipath resistance uptake improve predictions of retranslocation , 2014 .

[74]  Jed O. Kaplan,et al.  Application of a computationally efficient method to approximate gap model results with a probabilistic approach , 2014 .

[75]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Analysing Amazonian forest productivity using a new individual and trait-based model (TFS v.1) , 2014 .

[76]  P. Moorcroft,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy‐ and lidar‐derived estimates of canopy composition and structure to improve predictions of forest carbon fluxes and ecosystem dynamics , 2014 .

[77]  Christian Körner,et al.  Moving beyond photosynthesis: from carbon source to sink-driven vegetation modeling. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[78]  P. Reich The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto , 2014 .

[79]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies , 2014, The New phytologist.

[80]  Kuno M. Strassmann,et al.  Past and future carbon fluxes from land use change, shifting cultivation and wood harvest , 2014 .

[81]  M. Dietze Gaps in knowledge and data driving uncertainty in models of photosynthesis , 2013, Photosynthesis Research.

[82]  D. Medvigy,et al.  Effects of seasonal variation of photosynthetic capacity on the carbon fluxes of a temperate deciduous forest , 2013 .

[83]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model , 2013 .

[84]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[85]  Jonathan Seaquist,et al.  Implications of accounting for land use in simulations of ecosystem carbon cycling in Africa , 2013 .

[86]  R. Negrón‐Juárez,et al.  The impacts of tropical cyclones on the net carbon balance of eastern US forests (1851–2000) , 2013 .

[87]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  A stand‐alone tree demography and landscape structure module for Earth system models , 2013 .

[88]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  Drought-induced defoliation and long periods of near-zero gas exchange play a key role in accentuating metabolic decline of Scots pine. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[89]  Chonggang Xu,et al.  Our limited ability to predict vegetation dynamics under water stress. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[90]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[91]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Evaluating theories of drought-induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel-experiment framework. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[92]  Jed O. Kaplan,et al.  GAPPARD: a computationally efficient method of approximating gap-scale disturbance in vegetation models , 2013 .

[93]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Effect of Anthropogenic Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes on Climate and Land Carbon Storage in CMIP5 Projections for the Twenty-First Century , 2013 .

[94]  W. Collins,et al.  The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research , 2013 .

[95]  Rob Kooper,et al.  On improving the communication between models and data. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[96]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated CO2: a model‐data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites , 2013, Global change biology.

[97]  Michael C. Dietze,et al.  Facilitating feedbacks between field measurements and ecosystem models , 2013 .

[98]  Simon Scheiter,et al.  Next-generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[99]  Steven P. Brumby,et al.  Quantifying tree mortality in a mixed species woodland using multitemporal high spatial resolution satellite imagery , 2013 .

[100]  Jonathan Seaquist,et al.  Implications of accounting for land use in simulations of ecosystem services and carbon cycling in Africa , 2013 .

[101]  S. Levin,et al.  Competition for Water and Light in Closed-Canopy Forests: A Tractable Model of Carbon Allocation with Implications for Carbon Sinks , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[102]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Technical description of version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2013 .

[103]  L. Anderegg,et al.  Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress , 2013 .

[104]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Guess the impact of Ips typographus—An ecosystem modelling approach for simulating spruce bark beetle outbreaks , 2012 .

[105]  D. Medvigy,et al.  Simulated impacts of insect defoliation on forest carbon dynamics , 2012 .

[106]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Implementing storm damage in a dynamic vegetation model for regional applications in Sweden , 2012 .

[107]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Root niche separation can explain avoidance of seasonal drought stress and vulnerability of overstory trees to extended drought in a mature Amazonian forest , 2012 .

[108]  Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro,et al.  Amazon forest carbon dynamics predicted by profiles of canopy leaf area and light environment. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[109]  A. Nardini,et al.  Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought , 2012, Nature.

[110]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  A framework for benchmarking land models , 2012 .

[111]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory-2: Increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion , 2012 .

[112]  Takeshi Ise,et al.  Effect of plant dynamic processes on African vegetation responses to climate change: Analysis using the spatially explicit individual‐based dynamic global vegetation model (SEIB‐DGVM) , 2012 .

[113]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Estimating plot-level tree structure in a deciduous forest by combining allometric equations, spatial wavelet analysis and airborne LiDAR , 2012 .

[114]  N. McDowell,et al.  Hydraulic limits preceding mortality in a piñon-juniper woodland under experimental drought. , 2012, Plant, cell & environment.

[115]  S. Gotsch,et al.  Ecological thresholds at the savanna-forest boundary: how plant traits, resources and fire govern the distribution of tropical biomes. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[116]  Nate G. McDowell,et al.  Toward a Mechanistic Modeling of Nitrogen Limitation on Vegetation Dynamics , 2012, PloS one.

[117]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Determining robust impacts of land-use induced land-cover changes on surface climate over North America and Eurasia; Results from the first set of LUCID experiments , 2012 .

[118]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Simulating the Biogeochemical and Biogeophysical Impacts of Transient Land Cover Change and Wood Harvest in the Community Climate System Model (CCSM4) from 1850 to 2100 , 2012 .

[119]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Seasonal carbon dynamics and water fluxes in an Amazon rainforest , 2012 .

[120]  David Medvigy,et al.  Predicting ecosystem dynamics at regional scales: an evaluation of a terrestrial biosphere model for the forests of northeastern North America , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[121]  M. R. Evans,et al.  Modelling ecological systems in a changing world , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[122]  Daniel M. Kashian,et al.  Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada , 2012 .

[123]  C. Field,et al.  The roles of hydraulic and carbon stress in a widespread climate-induced forest die-off , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[124]  A. Baccini,et al.  Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar , 2011 .

[125]  M. Zeppel,et al.  Mechanistic causes of tree drought mortality: recent results, unresolved questions and future research needs. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[126]  P. Moorcroft,et al.  Tree mortality in the eastern and central United States: patterns and drivers , 2011 .

[127]  S. Emori,et al.  MIROC-ESM 2010: model description and basic results of CMIP5-20c3m experiments , 2011 .

[128]  N. McDowell,et al.  The interdependence of mechanisms underlying climate-driven vegetation mortality. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[129]  Sönke Zaehle,et al.  Carbon–nitrogen interactions on land at global scales: current understanding in modelling climate biosphere feedbacks , 2011 .

[130]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands , 2011 .

[131]  J. Lamarque,et al.  The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations , 2011 .

[132]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data , 2011 .

[133]  Ryan Pavlick,et al.  The relative importance of seed competition, resource competition and perturbations on community structure , 2011 .

[134]  Eric A. Davidson,et al.  Carbon Inputs and Water Uptake in Deep Soils of an Eastern Amazon Forest , 2011, Forest Science.

[135]  S. Pacala,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Strategy Carbon Allocation to Foliage, Wood, and Fine Roots in Trees Competing for Light and Nitrogen: An Analytically Tractable, Individual-Based Model and Quantitative Comparisons to Data , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[136]  M. Rummukainen,et al.  A model of the coupled dynamics of climate, vegetation and terrestrial ecosystem biogeochemistry for regional applications , 2011 .

[137]  E. Meron Modeling Dryland Landscapes , 2011 .

[138]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model , 2011 .

[139]  Mathieu Javaux,et al.  A one-dimensional model of water flow in soil-plant systems based on plant architecture , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[140]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  Uncertainties in the 20th century carbon budget associated with land use change , 2010 .

[141]  D. Coomes,et al.  Influences of Forest Structure, Climate and Species Composition on Tree Mortality across the Eastern US , 2010, PloS one.

[142]  P. Ciais,et al.  Mortality as a key driver of the spatial distribution of aboveground biomass in Amazonian forest: results from a dynamic vegetation model , 2010 .

[143]  A. Sterl,et al.  EC-Earth A Seamless earth-System Prediction Approach in Action , 2010 .

[144]  T. A. Black,et al.  A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis , 2010 .

[145]  Paul J. DeMott,et al.  Observation of playa salts as nuclei in orographic wave clouds , 2010 .

[146]  F. Woodward,et al.  Assessing uncertainties in a second-generation dynamic vegetation model caused by ecological scale limitations. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[147]  S. Andelman,et al.  Drought-mortality relationships for tropical forests. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[148]  Sandy P. Harrison,et al.  The influence of vegetation, fire spread and fire behaviour on biomass burning and trace gas emissions: results from a process-based model , 2010 .

[149]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Linking models and data on vegetation structure , 2010 .

[150]  Andrew D. Friend,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O‐CN land surface model: 1. Model description, site‐scale evaluation, and sensitivity to parameter estimates , 2010 .

[151]  N. Delbart,et al.  Simulation study of the vegetation structure and function in eastern Siberian larch forests using the individual-based vegetation model SEIB-DGVM , 2010 .

[152]  C. Proisy,et al.  The variation of apparent crown size and canopy heterogeneity across lowland Amazonian forests , 2010 .

[153]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Hotspots of vegetation-climate feedbacks under future greenhouse forcing in Europe , 2010 .

[154]  M. Claussen,et al.  Effects of anthropogenic land cover change on the carbon cycle of the last millennium , 2009 .

[155]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Hysteresis of soil moisture spatial heterogeneity and the “homogenizing” effect of vegetation , 2009 .

[156]  Rachel M. Law,et al.  A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere , 2009 .

[157]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Carbon cycling under 300 years of land use change: Importance of the secondary vegetation sink , 2009 .

[158]  Hisashi Sato,et al.  Simulation of the vegetation structure and function in a Malaysian tropical rain forest using the individual-based dynamic vegetation model SEIB-DGVM , 2009 .

[159]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[160]  James H Brown,et al.  Extensions and evaluations of a general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[161]  R. Deo,et al.  Impact of historical land cover change on daily indices of climate extremes including droughts in eastern Australia , 2009 .

[162]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: Ecosystem Demography model version 2 , 2009 .

[163]  John A Silander,et al.  Multivariate forecasts of potential distributions of invasive plant species. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[164]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  Mathematical models of vegetation pattern formation in ecohydrology , 2009 .

[165]  Alessandro Neri,et al.  Imaging Spectroscopy , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[166]  T. Tao,et al.  A VARIATION , 2009 .

[167]  Darren T. Drewry,et al.  The Jena Diversity-Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (JeDi-DGVM): a diverse approach to representing t , 2012 .

[168]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Using lidar data and a height-structured ecosystem model to estimate forest carbon stocks and fluxes over mountainous terrain , 2008 .

[169]  S. Pacala,et al.  Predicting and understanding forest dynamics using a simple tractable model , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[170]  J. Dushoff,et al.  SCALING FROM TREES TO FORESTS: TRACTABLE MACROSCOPIC EQUATIONS FOR FOREST DYNAMICS , 2008 .

[171]  James S. Clark,et al.  Evaluating the sources of potential migrant species: implications under climate change. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[172]  M. Williams,et al.  An analysis of the sensitivity of sap flux to soil and plant variables assessed for an Australian woodland using a soil-plant-atmosphere model. , 2008, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[173]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space , 2008 .

[174]  S. Sitch,et al.  The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2008 .

[175]  S. Pacala,et al.  Predictive Models of Forest Dynamics , 2008, Science.

[176]  G. Bonan Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[177]  N. McDowell,et al.  Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? , 2008, The New phytologist.

[178]  Ehud Meron,et al.  Woody Species as Landscape Modulators and Their Effect on Biodiversity Patterns , 2008 .

[179]  Kelly K. Caylor,et al.  On soil moisture–vegetation feedbacks and their possible effects on the dynamics of dryland ecosystems , 2007 .

[180]  J. Chave,et al.  The role of gap phase processes in the biomass dynamics of tropical forests , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[181]  Y. Malhi,et al.  The response of an Eastern Amazonian rain forest to drought stress: results and modelling analyses from a throughfall exclusion experiment , 2007 .

[182]  Todd M. Scanlon,et al.  Positive feedbacks promote power-law clustering of Kalahari vegetation , 2007, Nature.

[183]  E. Meron,et al.  Dynamics and spatial organization of plant communities in water-limited systems. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[184]  Jean-Luc Widlowski,et al.  Third Radiation Transfer Model Intercomparison (RAMI) exercise: Documenting progress in canopy reflectance models , 2007 .

[185]  Hisashi Sato,et al.  SEIB–DGVM: A new Dynamic Global Vegetation Model using a spatially explicit individual-based approach , 2007 .

[186]  John H. C. Gash,et al.  Improving the representation of radiation interception and photosynthesis for climate model applications , 2007 .

[187]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  TreeMig: A forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale , 2006 .

[188]  G. Hurtt,et al.  The contributions of land‐use change, CO2 fertilization, and climate variability to the Eastern US carbon sink , 2006 .

[189]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Implementing plant hydraulic architecture within the LPJ Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2006 .

[190]  S. Twiss,et al.  A physically motivated index of subgrid‐scale pattern , 2006 .

[191]  H. Schenk,et al.  Root competition: beyond resource depletion , 2006 .

[192]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  How close are we to a predictive science of the biosphere? , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[193]  S. Malyshev,et al.  The underpinnings of land‐use history: three centuries of global gridded land‐use transitions, wood‐harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands , 2006 .

[194]  G. Boer,et al.  Simulating Competition and Coexistence between Plant Functional Types in a Dynamic Vegetation Model , 2006 .

[195]  Stephanie A. Bohlman,et al.  Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[196]  Patrick Meir,et al.  Evidence from Amazonian forests is consistent with isohydric control of leaf water potential. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[197]  W. Cohen,et al.  Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat , 2005 .

[198]  Tod A. Laursen,et al.  Finite element tree crown hydrodynamics model (FETCH) using porous media flow within branching elements: A new representation of tree hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[199]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[200]  P. Stenberg,et al.  Simple parameterizations of the radiation budget of uniform broadleaved and coniferous canopies , 2005 .

[201]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Tropical forest tree mortality, recruitment and turnover rates: calculation, interpretation and comparison when census intervals vary , 2004 .

[202]  F. Woodward,et al.  Vegetation dynamics – simulating responses to climatic change , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[203]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Beyond potential vegetation: Combining lidar data and a height-structured model for carbon studies , 2004 .

[204]  Ehud Meron,et al.  Vegetation patterns along a rainfall gradient , 2004 .

[205]  K. Oleson,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for use with climate models: concepts and description of simulated vegetation dynamics , 2003 .

[206]  O. Solbrig,et al.  The role of topkill in the differential response of savanna woody species to fire , 2003 .

[207]  J. Townshend,et al.  Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: examples using AVHRR and MODIS data , 2002 .

[208]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Tree‐grass competition in space and time: Insights from a simple cellular automata model based on ecohydrological dynamics , 2002 .

[209]  H. Bugmann A Review of Forest Gap Models , 2001 .

[210]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Evaluating different soil and plant hydraulic constraints on tree function using a model and sap flow data from ponderosa pine , 2001 .

[211]  Peter M. Cox,et al.  Description of the "TRIFFID" Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2001 .

[212]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[213]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  On the spatial and temporal links between vegetation, climate, and soil moisture , 1999 .

[214]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[215]  G. Hurtt,et al.  Terrestrial models and global change: challenges for the future , 1998 .

[216]  F. Woodward,et al.  Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change , 1998, Nature.

[217]  Frederick R. Adler,et al.  Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model , 1998 .

[218]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants , 1998, Oecologia.

[219]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes , 1996 .

[220]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[221]  David Tilman,et al.  Limiting Similarity in Mechanistic and Spatial Models of Plant Competition in Heterogeneous Environments , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[222]  P. Sellers Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration , 1985 .

[223]  R. Dickinson Land Surface Processes and Climate—Surface Albedos and Energy Balance , 1983 .

[224]  C. Bohren,et al.  An introduction to atmospheric radiation , 1981 .

[225]  L. D. James Nonstructural measures for flood control , 1965 .

[226]  M. P.R.,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2022 .

[227]  S S I T C H,et al.  Evaluation of Ecosystem Dynamics, Plant Geography and Terrestrial Carbon Cycling in the Lpj Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2022 .