Integration of Sustainability Into Early Design Through the Function Impact Matrix

The issue of environmental sustainability, which is unprecedented in both magnitude and complexity, presents one of the biggest challenges faced by modern society. Design engineers can make significant contributions by incorporating environmental awareness into product and process development. It is critical that engineers make a paradigm shift in product design from centering on cost and performance to balancing economic, environmental, and societal considerations. Although there have been quite a few designs for environment (or ecodesign) tools developed, so far, these tools have only achieved limited industrial penetration. The present-day methods are either too qualitative to offer concrete solutions and not effective for designers with limited experience or too quantitative, costly, and time consuming. Thus, current ecodesign tools cannot be implemented during the early design phases. This paper develops a novel, semiquantitative ecodesign methodology that is targeted specifically toward the early stages of the design process. The new methodology is a combination of environmental life cycle assessment and visual tools such as quality function deployment, functional-component matrix, and Pugh chart. Since the early design process is function-oriented, a new visual tool called the function impact matrix has been developed to correlate environmental impacts with product function. Redesign of office staplers for reduced carbon footprint has been selected as a case study to demonstrate the use of the proposed approach. Life cycle assessment results confirm that the new stapler design generated using this methodology promotes improved environmental performance.

[1]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[2]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  A framework for the integration of environmental and business aspects toward sustainable product development , 2008 .

[3]  Joel Ann Todd,et al.  Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment : A Final Report from the SETAC North America Streamlined LCA Workgroup , 1999 .

[4]  Gordon Ellis,et al.  Grand challenges for engineering , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[5]  Vicky Lofthouse,et al.  Ecodesign tools for designers: defining the requirements , 2006 .

[6]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  DEA: A method for ranking the greeness of design decisions , 2002 .

[7]  David W. Watkins,et al.  Educating engineers in the sustainable futures model with a global perspective , 2008 .

[8]  Tomohiko Sakao,et al.  A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design , 2007 .

[9]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[10]  E.C. Pappas,et al.  Sustainable engineering design at James Madison University , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[11]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Higher Level Design Methods Applied to the Conceptual Design of an MALE UAV , 2008 .

[12]  Biren Prasad,et al.  Review of QFD and related deployment techniques , 1998 .

[13]  Panos Y. Papalambros Who Cares for Planet Earth , 2009 .

[14]  Ferdinand Quella,et al.  Integrating environmental aspects into product design and development the new ISO TR 14062 , 2003 .

[15]  Steven R. Harper,et al.  Incorporating Environmental Impacts in Strategic Redesign of an Engineered System , 2008 .

[16]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[17]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[18]  Jessica Lagerstedt,et al.  EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development , 2006 .

[19]  Fumihiko Kimura,et al.  Sustainable Design of Modern Industrial Products , 2006 .

[20]  Kathy Potosnak,et al.  Conceptual design , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  M. Chertow The IPAT Equation and Its Variants Changing Views of Technology and Environmental Impact , 2001 .

[22]  M. Chertow The IPAT Equation and Its Variants , 2000 .

[23]  J. Fava,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment Practitioner Survey: Summary of Results , 2006 .

[24]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[25]  Casper Boks,et al.  The soft side of ecodesign , 2006 .

[26]  Keijiro Masui,et al.  Applying Quality Function Deployment to environmentally conscious design , 2003 .

[27]  Liselotte Schebek,et al.  Volkswagen slimLCI: a procedure for streamlined inventory modelling within life cycle assessment of vehicles , 2008 .