Fundamental Limits and Design Guidelines for Miniaturizing Ultra-Wideband Antennas

Fundamental physical limitations restrict an antenna's performance based on its electrical size. These fundamental limits are of the utmost importance, since the minimum size needed to achieve a particular figure of merit can be determined from them. In this paper, the physical limitations of antennas are reviewed in general, with particular emphasis on impedance matching as it relates to ultra-wideband (UWB) antennas (high-pass response). Additionally, the use of antenna miniaturization techniques to approach these limits is discussed. Using a spiral antenna as an example, guidelines are presented for miniaturizing UWB antennas.

[1]  S. Schelkunoff.  Theory of Antennas of Arbitrary Size and Shape , 1941, Proceedings of the IRE.

[2]  S. Schelkunoff.  A mathematical theory of linear arrays , 1943 .

[3]  H. W. Bode,et al.  Network analysis and feedback amplifier design , 1945 .

[4]  H.A. Wheeler,et al.  Fundamental Limitations of Small Antennas , 1947, Proceedings of the IRE.

[5]  L. J. Chu.  Physical Limitations of Omni‐Directional Antennas , 1948 .

[6]  R. Fano.  Theoretical limitations on the broadband matching of arbitrary impedances , 1950 .

[7]  R. Harrington.  On the gain and beamwidth of directional antennas , 1958 .

[8]  H. A. Wheeler.  The Radiansphere around a Small Antenna , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[9]  Roger F. Harrington,et al.  Effect of antenna size on gain, bandwidth, and efficiency , 1960 .

[10]  R. Bawer,et al.  The spiral antenna , 1960 .

[11]  R. Harrington.  Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields , 1961 .

[12]  R. Collin,et al.  Evaluation of antenna Q , 1964 .

[13]  V. Rumsey.  Frequency independent antennas , 1966 .

[14]  R. Fante.  Quality factor of general ideal antennas , 1969 .

[15]  H. Wheeler.  The wide-band matching area for a small antenna , 1983 .

[16]  D. Pozar.  Microwave Engineering , 1990 .

[17]  R. Fante.  Maximum possible gain for an arbitrary ideal antenna with specified quality factor , 1992 .

[18]  J. Mclean.  A re-examination of the fundamental limits on the radiation Q of electrically small antennas , 1996 .

[19]  Norman Dye,et al.  Wideband Impedance Matching , 2001 .

[20]  W. Geyi.  Physical limitations of antenna , 2003 .

[21]  A.J. Poggio,et al.  The Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC) - a brief history , 2004, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium, 2004..

[22]  A.R. Lopez,et al.  Review of narrowband impedance-matching limitations , 2004, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[23]  S. Best,et al.  Impedance, bandwidth, and Q of antennas , 2005 .

[24]  H. Thal.  New Radiation$Q$Limits for Spherical Wire Antennas , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[25]  A.R. Lopez.  Fundamental hmrations of small antennas: validation of wheeler's formulas , 2006, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[26]  R. Hansen.  Electrically Small, Superdirective, and Superconducting Antennas: Hansen/Electrically Small, Superdirective, and Superconducting Antennas , 2006 .

[27]  I. Sen Gupta,et al.  Boadband tuning limits on UWB antennas based on Fano's formulation , 2006, 2006 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium.

[28]  J. Volakis,et al.  Distributed Lumped Loads and Lossy Transmission Line Model for Wideband Spiral Antenna Miniaturization and Characterization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[29]  J. Volakis,et al.  Size Reduction of a Low-Profile Spiral Antenna Using Inductive and Dielectric Loading , 2008, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.