Mid-term survivorship of primary total knee arthroplasty with a specific implant.

The purpose of this study was to assess mid-term survivorship following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with Optetrak Logic components and identify the most common revision indications at a single institution. We identified a retrospective cohort of 7,941 Optetrak primary TKAs performed from January 2010 to December 2018. We reviewed the intraoperative findings of 369 TKAs that required revision TKA from January 2010 to December 2021 and the details of the revision implants used. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survivorship. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the impact of patient variables and year of implantation on survival time. The estimated survivorship free of all-cause revision was 98% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97% to 98%), 95% (95% CI 95% to 96%), and 86% (95% CI 83% to 88%) at two, five, and ten years, respectively. In 209/369 revisions there was a consistent constellation of findings with varying severity that included polyethylene wear and associated synovitis, osteolysis, and component loosening. This failure mode, which we refer to as aseptic mechanical failure, was the most common revision indication. The mean time from primary TKA to revision for aseptic mechanical failure was five years (5 months to 11 years). In this series of nearly 8,000 primary TKAs performed with a specific implant, we identified a lower-than-expected mid-term survivorship and a high number of revisions with a unique presentation. This study, along with the recent recall of the implant, confirms the need for frequent monitoring of patients with Optetrak TKAs given the incidence of polyethylene failure, osteolysis, and component loosening.

[1]  G. Sheridan,et al.  High rate of tibial debonding and failure in a popular knee replacement , 2022, Bone & joint open.

[2]  D. Berry,et al.  What factors drive polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty? : results of a large retrieval series. , 2021, The bone & joint journal.

[3]  F. Haddad,et al.  Current concepts in total knee arthroplasty , 2021, Bone & joint open.

[4]  N. Clement,et al.  Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2021, The bone & joint journal.

[5]  T. Wright,et al.  Early Aseptic Loosening with Increased Presence and Severity of Backside Burnishing in the Optetrak Logic Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component , 2021, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[6]  A. Jakuscheit,et al.  Periprosthetic infection is the major indication for TKA revision – experiences from a university referral arthroplasty center , 2018, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[7]  Timothy M Wright,et al.  Failure After Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study of 18,065 Knees. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  P. Bonutti,et al.  Unusually High Rate of Early Failure of Tibial Component in ATTUNE Total Knee Arthroplasty System at Implant–Cement Interface , 2017, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[9]  S. Young,et al.  Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees , 2017, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years? , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  D. Saragaglia,et al.  Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years' follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases. , 2013, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[12]  M. Pagnano,et al.  Aseptic Tibial Debonding as a Cause of Early Failure in a Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Design , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  A. Abdeen,et al.  Fifteen-year to 19-year follow-up of the Insall-Burstein-1 total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  R. Bourne,et al.  Wear rate of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  Jocelyn M. Cottrell,et al.  PFC Knee Replacement: Osteolytic Failures From Extreme Polyethylene Degradation , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  C. Ko,et al.  Factors predicting complication rates following total knee replacement. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  C. Engh,et al.  Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  D. W. Roberts,et al.  Factors Influencing Wear and Osteolysis in Press-Fit Condylar Modular Total Knee Replacements , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .