The use of tree crown variables in over-bark diameter and volume prediction models

Abstract: Linear and nonlinear crown variable functions for 173 Brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) trees were incorporated into a well-known compatible volume and taper equation to evaluate their effect in model prediction accuracy. In addition, the same crown variables were also incorporated into three neural network (NN) types (Back-Propagation, Levenberg-Marquardt and Generalized Regression Neural Networks) to investigate their applicability in over-bark diameter and stem volume predictions. The inclusion of crown ratio and crown ratio with crown length variables resulted in a significant reduction of model sum of squared error, for all models. The incorporation of the crown variables to these models significantly improved model performance. According to results, non-linear regression models were less accurate than the three types of neural network models tested for both over-bark diameter and stem volume predictions in terms of standard error of the estimate and fit index. Specifically, the generated Levenberg-Marquardt Neural Network models outperformed the other models in terms of prediction accuracy. Therefore, this type of neural network model is worth consideration in over-bark diameter and volume prediction modeling, which are some of the most challenging tasks in forest resources management.

[1]  Maria J. Diamantopoulou,et al.  Artificial neural networks as an alternative tool in pine bark volume estimation , 2005 .

[2]  Quang V. Cao,et al.  Use of crown ratio to improve loblolly pine taper equations , 1986 .

[3]  B. Yegnanarayana,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks , 2004 .

[4]  C. Muhairwe Tree form and taper variation over time for interior lodgepole pine , 1994 .

[5]  Hsiao-Tien Pao,et al.  A comparison of neural network and multiple regression analysis in modeling capital structure , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  D. Hann,et al.  Forest Growth and Yield Modeling: Vanclay/Forest Growth and Yield Modeling , 2011 .

[7]  M. Diamantopoulou,et al.  Estimating tree bole volume using artificial neural network models for four species in Turkey. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Lichao Jiang,et al.  Segmented taper equations with crown ratio and stand density for Dahurian Larch (Larix gmelinii) in Northeastern China , 2011, Journal of Forestry Research.

[9]  Prabhat Mahanti,et al.  Soft Computing Methodologies in Bioinformatics , 2009 .

[10]  R. Bailey Upper stem volumes from stem analysis data: an overlapping bolts method , 1995 .

[11]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[12]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[13]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resource variables: a review of modelling issues and applications , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  J. H. Smith,et al.  Standards for evaluating taper estimating systems , 1993 .

[15]  Harold E. Burkhart,et al.  A Generalized Approach for Modeling and Localizing Stem Profile Curves , 2006, Forest Science.

[16]  A. Robinson,et al.  Improving Taper Equations of Loblolly Pine with Crown Dimensions in a Mixed-Effects Modeling Framework , 2004, Forest Science.

[17]  A. Mäkelä Derivation of stem taper from the pipe theory in a carbon balance framework. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[18]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  A general regression neural network , 1991, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[19]  Maria J. Diamantopoulou Filling gaps in diameter measurements on standing tree boles in the urban forest of Thessaloniki, Greece , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  Aaron R. Weiskittel,et al.  Comparison of model forms for estimating stem taper and volume in the primary conifer species of the North American Acadian Region , 2010, Annals of Forest Science.

[21]  I A Basheer,et al.  Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[22]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Forest Growth and Yield Modeling , 2011 .

[23]  H. Petersson A segmented stem profile model for Pinus sylvestris , 1999 .

[24]  Laurene V. Fausett,et al.  Fundamentals Of Neural Networks , 1994 .

[25]  Lichun Jiang,et al.  Using Crown Ratio in Yellow-Poplar Compatible Taper and Volume Equations , 2007 .

[26]  H. Burkhart,et al.  Incorporating crown ratio into taper equations for loblolly pine trees , 1985 .

[27]  Simon A. Corne,et al.  Predicting forest attributes In southeast Alaska using artificial neural networks , 2004 .

[28]  Huiquan Bi,et al.  Trigonometric Variable-Form Taper Equations for Australian Eucalypts , 2000, Forest Science.

[29]  Richard Price,et al.  A generalized regression neural network for logo recognition , 2000, KES'2000. Fourth International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Engineering Systems and Allied Technologies. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8516).

[30]  A. Kozak,et al.  Effects of multicollinearity and autocorrelation on the variable-exponent taper functions , 1997 .

[31]  Lichun Jiang,et al.  Compatible taper and volume equations for yellow-poplar in West Virginia , 2005 .

[32]  V. Clark Baldwin,et al.  Predicting Diameter Distributions of Longleaf Pine Plantations: A Comparison Between Artificial Neural Networks and Other Accepted Methodologies , 2001 .

[33]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[34]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[35]  Daniel Henrique Breda Binoti,et al.  Estimation of inside-bark diameter and heartwood diameter for Tectona grandis Linn. trees using artificial neural networks , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[36]  R. M. Newnham Variable-form taper functions for four Alberta tree species , 1992 .

[37]  P. Larson Stem Form Development of Forest Trees , 1963 .

[38]  Ehsan Mesbahi,et al.  Artificial neural networks: fundamentals , 2003 .