The impact of media multitasking on learning

While multitasking is not a new concept, it has received increasing attention in recent years with the development of new media and technologies. Recent trends appear to suggest that multitasking is on the rise among the younger generation. The purpose of the study is to determine if students obtain more or less information in multitasking conditions. We examined the relationships of multitasking to attention, cognitive load and media with 130 college student participants. In this study, participants were given a timed (16 minutes) reading comprehension test in three conditions: Silence (only reading), Background multitasking (reading with a non-tested video shown simultaneously), and Test multitasking (reading with a tested video shown simultaneously) conditions. Our findings indicated that: (1) participants in the Background condition performed as well as those in the Silence condition, and (2) when participants were tested on their video comprehension, the group in the Test condition performed significantly better than the group in the Background condition. The results of this study suggest that cognitive load plays an important role in determining how much information is retained when students perform more than one task at a time.

[1]  Laura E. Levine,et al.  Electronic Media Use, Reading, and Academic Distractibility in College Youth , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Luciana Ferreira,et al.  Don’t bother me, Mom, I’m Learning!: how computer and vídeo game are preparing your kids for 21st century success and how you can help! , 2008 .

[3]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[4]  Shalom M. Fisch,et al.  A Capacity Model of Children's Comprehension of Educational Content on Television , 2000 .

[5]  D. Broadbent.  A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. , 1957, Psychological review.

[6]  G. Small,et al.  iBrain: Surviving the Technological Alteration of the Modern Mind , 2008 .

[7]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[8]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[9]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[10]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Facebook® and academic performance , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Yeung,et al.  Cognitive Load and Learner Expertise: Split-Attention and Redundancy Effects in Reading with Explanatory Notes , 1998, Contemporary educational psychology.

[12]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[13]  V. Rideout,et al.  Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds , 2010 .

[14]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning , 2005 .

[16]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  Henry Jenkins.  Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[19]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[20]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[21]  Carrie B. Fried,et al.  In-class laptop use and its e V ects on student learning , 2006 .

[22]  Joni Smith Gardner.  Simultaneous Media Usage: Effects on Attention , 2008 .

[23]  Jonathan Rosen,et al.  Distractions, Distractions: Does Instant Messaging Affect College Students' Performance on a Concurrent Reading Comprehension Task? , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[24]  U. Foehr.  MEDIA MULTITASKING AMONG AMERICAN YOUTH: PREVALENCE, PREDICTORS AND PAIRINGS , 2006 .