Using GIS and Ecological Variables to Identify High Potential Areas for Paleoanthropological Survey: An Example from Northern Armenia

The timing and nature of the initial hominid dispersals from Africa during the Plio-Pleistocene (here 2.0-1.5 million years ago [MYR]) is an issue of great interest for paleoanthropology. However, the biological, technological, and ecological context of these dispersals remains cloudy due largely to a paucity of Eurasian paleoanthropological sites dating to this time period. Indeed, there are only a handful of well-accepted Plio-Pleistocene sites from Eurasia: Dmanisi in the Republic of Georgia at 1.77-1.81 MYR (de Lumley et al. 2002), the Nihewan and Yuanmou basins of China at 1.66-1.70 MYR (Zhu et al. 2008), and the Indonesian island of Java at least 1.66 MYR (Sangiran) but perhaps as early as 1.81 MYR (Mojokerto) (Larick et al. 2001; Swisher et al. 1994). Although the Levant, given its geographic location, is the most logical extraAfrican source of dispersing hominid populations, the earliest well-accepted occupations there ('Ubeidiya in Israel) date to somewhat later in time at 1.4 MYR (Belmaker et al. 2002). Plio-Pleistocene sites are extremely rare, and sites preserved in high-integrity depositional contexts are even more so. In fact, the rich early Pleistocene component at Dmanisi was itself unearthed more-orless accidentally during the excavation of a medieval fortress (Djaparidze et al. 1989). As fortunate as this discovery was, survey efforts informed by ecologically relevant variables such as vegetation, geography, topography, and geology may not only increase the chances of finding paleoanthropological sites, but will also help place hominid occupations into a broader environmental context. Here we describe an approach to identify target areas for paleoanthropological survey. This method uses GIS to integrate data from archaeology and ecology to identify high potential areas for intensive ground survey. As an example, we present preand post-survey data from a new paleoanthropological research project in northern Armenia. FiElD notE

[1]  R. Potts,et al.  Early evidence of the genus Homo in East Asia. , 2008, Journal of human evolution.

[2]  V. Doronichev The Lower Paleolithic in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus: A Reappraisal of the Data and New Approaches , 2008 .

[3]  P. Valdes,et al.  A new global biome reconstruction and data‐model comparison for the Middle Pliocene , 2008 .

[4]  Sudijono,et al.  Early Pleistocene 40Ar/39Ar ages for Bapang Formation hominins, Central Jawa, Indonesia , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  G. Vashakidze,et al.  Geochronology of Pliocene volcanism in the Dzhavakheti Highland (the Lesser Caucasus). Part 1: Western part of the Dzhavakheti Highland , 2008 .

[6]  A. Vekua,et al.  The environmental contexts of early human occupation of Georgia (Transcaucasia). , 2000, Journal of human evolution.

[7]  Y. Sayadyan Upper Miocene, Pliocene, and Quaternary stratigraphic reference sections of large intermontane depressions in Armenia , 2006 .

[8]  O. Bar‐Yosef,et al.  New evidence for hominid presence in the Lower Pleistocene of the Southern Levant. , 2002, Journal of human evolution.

[9]  E. Carbonell,et al.  Eurasian Gates: The Earliest Human Dispersals , 2008, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[10]  Michael J. Rogers,et al.  Changing patterns of land use by Plio-Pleistocene hominids in the Lake Turkana Basin , 1994 .

[11]  C. Swisher,et al.  Age of the earliest known hominids in Java, Indonesia. , 1994, Science.

[12]  Konnie L. Wescott,et al.  GIS and archaeological site location modeling , 2005 .

[13]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1999 .

[14]  Sonia Harmand,et al.  Nouveaux sites paléolithiques anciens en République de Djibouti: Bilan préliminaire de prospections récentes dans le Bassin du Gobaad, Afar central , 2009 .