Spatial Representations of Virtual Mazes: The Role of Visual Fidelity and Individual Differences

Twenty-four people learned three versions of a room-sized maze: a wire-frame desktop virtual environment (VE), a normal surface-rendered desktop VE, and a real-world maze. Differences among the mental representations formed from each environment were measured with pointing and distance estimation tasks in a real-world version of each maze. People were more accurate at pointing after having learned the real and wire-frame VE maze than the surface-rendered VE maze; however, this effect was small compared with the effect of individual differences. Differences in gender, spatial ability, and prior computer experience were significantly related to the ability to acquire spatial information from the desktop VE. There was a high correlation between spatial knowledge when it was measured in the VE and spatial knowledge measured in the real world. Actual or potential applications include the design of effective VE training systems

[1]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Methodological convergence in cognitive mapping research: investigating configurational knowledge , 1996 .

[2]  E. Pedhazur Coding subjects in repeated measures designs. , 1977 .

[3]  Earl Hunt,et al.  ORIENTATION AND WAYFINDING: A REVIEW , 1999 .

[4]  Rudy Darken,et al.  Navigating in natural environments: a virtual environment training transfer study , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180).

[5]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  The Perception of Distance in Simulated Visual Displays:A Comparison of the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Multiple Depth Cues Across Viewing Distances , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Knowing where and getting there: a human navigation network. , 1998, Science.

[7]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Navigating Buildings in "Desk-Top" Virtual Environments: Experimental Investigations Using Extended Navigational Experience , 1997 .

[8]  John H. Bailey Spatial knowledge acquisition in a virtual environment , 1994 .

[9]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Influence of working memory on adult age differences in matrix reasoning. , 1993, British journal of psychology.

[10]  John J. Rieser,et al.  Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  E Lindberg,et al.  Acquisition of different types of locational information in cognitive maps: Automatic or effortful processing? , 1983, Psychological research.

[12]  Nigel Foreman,et al.  Transfer of Spatial Information from a Virtual to a Real Environment , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Robert Lloyd,et al.  Cognitive Maps: Encoding and Decoding Information , 1989 .

[14]  D. Waller,et al.  An assessment of individual differences in spatial knowledge of real and virtual environments , 1999 .

[15]  Matt J. Rossano,et al.  Spatial representations acquired from computer models : Cognitive load, orientation specificity and the acquisition of survey knowledge , 1998 .

[16]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[17]  Rudy Darken Wayfinding in large-scale virtual worlds , 1995, CHI '95.

[18]  John H. Bailey,et al.  Virtual spaces and real world places: transfer of route knowledge , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Bradley E. Huitema,et al.  The analysis of covariance and alternatives , 1980 .

[20]  R. Sutherland,et al.  A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  Spatial choice and spatial behavior : geographic essays on the analysis of preferences and perceptions , 1976 .

[22]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Earl Hunt,et al.  The Transfer of Spatial Knowledge in Virtual Environment Training , 1998, Presence.

[24]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  A Comparison of Methods for Estimating Directions in Egocentric Space , 1999, Perception.

[25]  L. Low,et al.  The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives , 1983 .

[26]  Richard A. Salome,et al.  The Visual Experience , 1990 .

[27]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Environmental Knowledge Is Subserved by Separable Dorsal/Ventral Neural Areas , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Locomotion Mode Affects the Updating of Objects Encountered During Travel: The Contribution of Vestibular and Proprioceptive Inputs to Path Integration , 1998, Presence.

[29]  Beverly K. Jaeger,et al.  The Effects of Training and Visual Detail on Accuracy of Movement Production in Virtual and Real-World Envionments , 1998 .

[30]  Patrick Péruch,et al.  Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge Through Visual Exploration of Simulated Environments , 1995 .