Accelerometer-Based Navigation Is as Accurate as Optical Computer Navigation in Restoring the Joint Line and Mechanical Axis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Matched Study.

[1]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of an accelerometer-based system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[2]  W. Bugbee,et al.  Accuracy of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. , 2014, The Knee.

[3]  A. Culyer.  Medical Services Advisory Committee , 2014 .

[4]  Vincent Masse,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty with a novel navigation system within the surgical field. , 2014, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[5]  D. Mayman,et al.  Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  J. G. Bonnin,et al.  ARTHROPLASTY , 1956, Der Orthopade.

[7]  A. Jawhar,et al.  Joint line changes after primary total knee arthroplasty: navigated versus non-navigated , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[8]  Denis Nam,et al.  Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of radiographic results. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  M. Dowsey,et al.  Joint line position correlates with function after primary total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  F. Orozco,et al.  Tibial shaft stress fractures resulting from placement of navigation tracker pins. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  M. Swank,et al.  Low incidence of postoperative complications due to pin placement in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  Karen Sloan,et al.  Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Impact of hospital volume on the economic value of computer navigation for total knee replacement. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  J. Carey.  The Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Reconstruction and Basic Science , 2008 .

[15]  B. Morrey.  Navigated Total Knee Replacement: A Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[16]  T. Fehring,et al.  Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  K. Bozic,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  S. Yeo,et al.  Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  K. Sloan,et al.  Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  A Leardini,et al.  Alignments and Clinical Results in Conventional and Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  K. Buehler,et al.  Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  Pak Lin Chin,et al.  Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  Ak SharmaCol,et al.  Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics , 2004 .

[24]  D. Banzer,et al.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  R B Bourne,et al.  Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[26]  W H Rogers,et al.  Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1995, Medical care.

[27]  K. Heiple,et al.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  J. Duparc,et al.  [Radiological measurement of the angular deviation of the knee in the frontal plane]. , 1967, Annales de radiologie.