Next-Generation Sequencing Panels for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer and Polyposis Syndromes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

PURPOSE To evaluate the cost effectiveness of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyposis (CRCP) syndromes in patients referred to cancer genetics clinics. PATIENTS AND METHODS We developed a decision model to evaluate NGS panel testing compared with current standard of care in patients referred to a cancer genetics clinic. We obtained data on the prevalence of genetic variants from a large academic laboratory and calculated the costs and health benefits of identifying relatives with a pathogenic variant, in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We classified the CRCP syndromes according to their type of inheritance and penetrance of colorectal cancer. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty. RESULTS Evaluation with an NGS panel that included Lynch syndrome genes and other genes associated with highly penetrant CRCP syndromes led to an average increase of 0.151 year of life, 0.128 QALY, and $4,650 per patient, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $36,500 per QALY compared with standard care and a 99% probability that this panel was cost effective at a threshold of $100,000 per QALY. When compared with this panel, the addition of genes with low colorectal cancer penetrance resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $77,300 per QALY. CONCLUSION The use of an NGS panel that includes genes associated with highly penetrant CRCP syndromes in addition to Lynch syndrome genes as a first-line test is likely to provide meaningful clinical benefits in a cost-effective manner at a $100,000 per QALY threshold.

[1]  G. Sanders,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine , 2016 .

[2]  E. Adang,et al.  Fourfold increased detection of Lynch syndrome by raising age limit for tumour genetic testing from 50 to 70 years is cost-effective. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  I. Frayling,et al.  A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome. , 2014, Health technology assessment.

[4]  Joshua T. Cohen,et al.  Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  H. Hampel NCCN increases the emphasis on genetic/familial high-risk assessment in colorectal cancer. , 2014, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[6]  Kristen J. Vogel,et al.  The Evolution of Cancer Risk Assessment in the Era of Next Generation Sequencing , 2014, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[7]  Pablo Lapunzina,et al.  Impact of NGS in the medical sciences: Genetic syndromes with an increased risk of developing cancer as an example of the use of new technologies , 2013, Genetics and molecular biology.

[8]  Kenneth Offit,et al.  Translating genomics in cancer care. , 2013, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[9]  Marc S. Williams,et al.  Impact of age cutoffs on a lynch syndrome screening program. , 2013, Journal of oncology practice.

[10]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  Prevalence of germline PTEN, BMPR1A, SMAD4, STK11, and ENG mutations in patients with moderate-load colorectal polyps. , 2013, Gastroenterology.

[11]  J. Stockman,et al.  Strategies to Identify the Lynch Syndrome Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2013 .

[12]  Colin C Pritchard,et al.  ColoSeq provides comprehensive lynch and polyposis syndrome mutational analysis using massively parallel sequencing. , 2012, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[13]  J. Lupski,et al.  Human genome sequencing in health and disease. , 2012, Annual review of medicine.

[14]  O. Dekkers,et al.  Survival of MUTYH-Associated Polyposis Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Matched Control Colorectal Cancer Patients , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  Heather Hampel,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer , 2010, Genetics in Medicine.

[16]  Z. Szentirmay,et al.  Deletions removing the last exon of TACSTD1 constitute a distinct class of mutations predisposing to Lynch syndrome , 2009, Human mutation.

[17]  Monica R McClain,et al.  EGAPP supplementary evidence review: DNA testing strategies aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[18]  P. Møller,et al.  Guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis cancer) , 2007, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[19]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) diagnostics. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  W. Frankel,et al.  Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients. , 2006, Cancer research.

[21]  H. Morreau,et al.  Diagnostic Approach and Management of Lynch Syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Carcinoma): A Guide for Clinicians , 2006, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[22]  W. Frankel,et al.  Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Il-Jin Kim,et al.  [Hereditary colorectal cancer]. , 2005, The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi.

[24]  M. Weinstein,et al.  When does quality-adjusting life-years matter in cost-effectiveness analysis? , 2004, Health economics.

[25]  Sudhir Srivastava,et al.  Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  G. Petersen,et al.  AGA technical review on hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testing. , 2001, Gastroenterology.

[27]  H. Vasen Clinical diagnosis and management of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.