The temporal structure of motivation II: Determinants of reinforcement patterns in the local organization of intracranial reward.

When rats and other animals are permitted chronic and continuous access to intracranial reinforcement (intracranial self-stimulation (ICS)) they typically display episodic response patterns (bursts). The motivational determinants of response bursts are not known; however, previous studies have pointed to the importance of priming effects in ICS. To further investigate the role of priming in ICS bursts adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were allowed chronic (minimally 2-week) access to ICS, with bursts collected for a subsequent 10-day period. Analysis of burst patterns indicated (a) relatively higher initial response rates were associated with longer bursts, (b) rates of response generally increased within individual response bursts, and (c) higher initial rates were associated with bursts that persisted in contrast to those which did not. In addition, a tonic reinforcement effect was found in the analysis of overnight records. Several burst parameters were increased in the final vs the initial 2 hr of responding. The first three findings support a role for priming as one determinant of burst patterns. The final effect may point to a second mechanism involved in incentive seeking.

[1]  James L Olds Drives and reinforcements : behavioral studies of hypothalamic functions / by James Olds , 1977 .

[2]  Clustering in the output of behavior. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  R. F. Parrott,et al.  Studies on intracranial electrical self-stimulation in pigs in relation to ingestive and exploratory behaviour , 1979, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  T. Bliss,et al.  Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  A. Routtenberg The reward system of the brain. , 1978, Scientific American.

[6]  S. P. Grossman,et al.  Evidence for a conflict interpretation of anomalous effects of rewarding brain stimulation. , 1969, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  P. Maxim,et al.  Ultradian barpressing for rewarding brain stimulation in rhesus monkeys , 1979, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  I. Lenzer Differences between behavior reinforced by electrical stimulation of the brain and conventionally reinforced behavior: as associative analysis. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  M. Davis,et al.  Effects of interstimulus interval length and variability on startle-response habituation in the rat. , 1970, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  T. Bliss,et al.  Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the unanaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  L. Stein,et al.  Brain endorphins and the sense of well-being: a psychobiological hypothesis. , 1978, Advances in biochemical psychopharmacology.

[12]  T. Crow,et al.  Catecholamine-containing neurones and electrical self-stimulation: 2. A theoretical interpretation and some psychiatric implications , 1973, Psychological Medicine.

[13]  J. Panksepp,et al.  An incentive model of rewarding brain stimulation. , 1969, Psychological review.

[14]  C. Gallistel Motivation as central organizing process: the psychophysical approach to its functional and neurophysiological analysis. , 1975, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[15]  G. G. Ball,et al.  Intracranial stimulation as an avoidance or escape response , 1965 .

[16]  C. I. Howarth,et al.  SOME TESTS OF A THEORY OF INTRACRANIAL SELF-STIMULATION. , 1963, Psychological review.

[17]  R. Katz,et al.  The temporal structure of reinforcement: an analysis of brain-stimulated reward. , 1979, Behavioral and neural biology.