Noise propagation in hybrid models of nonlinear systems: The Ginzburg-Landau equation

Every physical phenomenon can be described by multiple models with varying degrees of fidelity. The computational cost of higher fidelity models (e.g., molecular dynamics simulations) is invariably higher than that of their lower fidelity counterparts (e.g., a continuum model based on differential equations). While the former might not be suitable for large-scale simulations, the latter are not universally valid. Hybrid algorithms provide a compromise between the computational efficiency of a coarse-scale model and the representational accuracy of a fine-scale description. This is achieved by conducting a fine-scale computation in subdomains where it is absolutely required (e.g., due to a local breakdown of a continuum model) and coupling it with a coarse-scale computation in the rest of a computational domain. We analyze the effects of random fluctuations generated by the fine-scale component of a nonlinear hybrid on the hybrid?s overall accuracy and stability. Two variants of the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equation (GLE) and their discrete representations provided by a nearest-neighbor Ising model serve as a computational testbed. Our analysis shows that coupling these descriptions in a one-dimensional simulation leads to erroneous results. Adding a random source term to the GLE provides accurate prediction of the mean behavior of the quantity of interest (magnetization). It also allows the two GLE variants to correctly capture the strength of the microscale fluctuations. Our work demonstrates the importance of fine-scale noise in hybrid simulations, and suggests the need for replacing an otherwise deterministic coarse-scale component of the hybrid with its stochastic counterpart.

[1]  Christoph Dellago,et al.  Coarse Graining the φ4 Model: Landau-Ginzburg Potentials from Computer Simulations , 2007 .

[2]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Hybrid Simulations of Reaction-Diffusion Systems in Porous Media , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Algorithm refinement for stochastic partial differential equations. , 2003 .

[4]  Ilenia Battiato,et al.  Homogenizability conditions for multicomponent reactive transport , 2013 .

[5]  Sanjay Puri,et al.  Kinetics of Phase Transitions , 2004 .

[6]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  On breakdown of macroscopic models of mixing-controlled heterogeneous reactions in porous media , 2009 .

[7]  H. Stanley,et al.  Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 1972 .

[8]  John B. Bell,et al.  Algorithm refinement for the stochastic Burgers' equation , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  Harold M. Hastings,et al.  Microscopic fluctuations and pattern formation in a supercritical oscillatory chemical system , 2003 .

[10]  J. Cardy Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics , 1996 .

[11]  P. Hohenberg,et al.  Theory of Dynamic Critical Phenomena , 1977 .

[12]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Noise in algorithm refinement methods , 2005, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[13]  M. Riva,et al.  Stochastic averaging of nonlinear flows in heterogeneous porous media , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Ioannis G Kevrekidis,et al.  Equation-free implementation of statistical moment closures. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  L. Landau,et al.  statistical-physics-part-1 , 1958 .

[16]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Algorithm refinement for stochastic partial differential equations: II. Correlated systems , 2005 .

[17]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Hybrid modeling of heterogeneous geochemical reactions in fractured porous media , 2013 .

[18]  K T Leung Heuristic derivation of continuum kinetic equations from microscopic dynamics. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  R. Glauber Time‐Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model , 1963 .

[20]  P. Kloeden,et al.  Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations , 1992 .

[21]  Ellad B. Tadmor,et al.  A unified framework and performance benchmark of fourteen multiscale atomistic/continuum coupling methods , 2009 .

[22]  A. Bray Theory of phase-ordering kinetics , 1994, cond-mat/9501089.

[23]  D M Tartakovsky,et al.  Applicability regimes for macroscopic models of reactive transport in porous media. , 2011, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[24]  Noam Bernstein,et al.  Spanning the continuum to quantum length scales in a dynamic simulation of brittle fracture , 1998 .

[25]  E. Ising Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus , 1925 .

[26]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Algorithm refinement for stochastic partial differential equations: I. linear diffusion , 2002 .