Leg ulcers and the Urgocell Non-Adhesive wound dressing.

The objectives of this clinical trial were to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the Urgocell Non-Adhesive (NA) dressing in the local management of venous or mixed leg ulcers. The study was a non-comparative, prospective, multicentre (15 centres) phase III, clinical trial. The studied population was composed of non-immunodepressed adults presenting a venous or mixed leg ulcer, uninfected, non-cancerous, present for less than 18 months. Patients were followed up for 6 weeks with a weekly visit, including a clinical examination, area tracings and photographs. Evaluation by nursing staff and patients was performed at each dressing changed. Forty-three patients were included, presenting a leg ulcer with a mean surface area of 10.7 cm2. The surface area was reduced by a mean of 38% after 6 weeks of treatment. Four local adverse events were deemed to be related to the tested treatment and acceptability was noted very good for patients and nursing staff. The Urgocell NA dressing, combined with compression therapy, promoted the healing of the chronic wounds under study. The good tolerance and acceptability of the tested dressing were greatly appreciated.

[1]  S. Bohbot,et al.  Using a new lipidocolloid dressing in paediatric wounds: results of French and German clinical studies. , 2004, Journal of wound care.

[2]  S. Barrett,et al.  Evaluation of Urgotul plus K-Four compression for venous leg ulcers , 2004 .

[3]  L. Téot,et al.  The healing properties of Promogran in venous leg ulcers. , 2002, Journal of wound care.

[4]  P. Senet,et al.  Urgotul: a novel non-adherent lipidocolloid dressing. , 2002, British journal of nursing.

[5]  A. Larsen,et al.  A randomized, controlled study to compare the effectiveness of two foam dressings in the management of lower leg ulcers , 2002 .

[6]  V. Falanga,et al.  Prognostic indicators in venous ulcers. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  D. Margolis,et al.  Which venous leg ulcers will heal with limb compression bandages? , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  C. Hansson,et al.  The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group. , 1998, International journal of dermatology.

[9]  K. Harding,et al.  A comparison of two dressings in pressure sore management. , 1997, Journal of wound care.

[10]  K. Harding,et al.  A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds. , 1997, Journal of wound care.

[11]  K. Harding,et al.  A comparison of two dressings in pressure sore management. , 1997, Journal of wound care.

[12]  M. Bowszyc-Dmochowska,et al.  Comparison of two dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. , 1995, Journal of wound care.

[13]  F. Zuccarelli [A comparative study of the hydrocellular dressing Allevyn and the hydrocolloid dressing Duoderm in the local treatment of leg ulcers]. , 1992, Phlebologie.

[14]  H. Pessenhofer,et al.  The Effect of a Two-Layered Polyurethane Foam Wound Dressing on the Healing of Venous Leg Ulcers , 1992 .

[15]  M. Frisén,et al.  A randomized trial of two occlusive dressings in the treatment of leg ulcers. , 1990, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[16]  P. A. Fall,et al.  Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses. , 1989, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[17]  G. Gorse,et al.  Improved pressure sore healing with hydrocolloid dressings. , 1987, Archives of dermatology.

[18]  W. Su,et al.  Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing. , 1984, Archives of dermatology.

[19]  G. Winter,et al.  Effect of Air Drying and Dressings on the Surface of a Wound , 1963, Nature.

[20]  G. Winter,et al.  Formation of the Scab and the Rate of Epithelization of Superficial Wounds in the Skin of the Young Domestic Pig , 1962, Nature.