Comparison of Diel Sampling Data for Sauger Collected by Electrofishing
暂无分享,去创建一个
ABSTRACT Using a stratified-random sampling design, we sampled sauger (Stizostedion canadense) by day and night electrofishing during the spring from Lewis and Clark Reservoir, South Dakota-Nebraska. Catch per unit effort (number of stock-length (≥20 cm) sauger caught per hour of electrofishing) did not vary among three sites (lake, transition area, and river; P=0.64) nor between diel periods (P=0.91). Size structure of samples, indexed using stock density indices, was consistently higher during the day than at night; sauger ≥51 cm were only collected during the day. Differential size structure for samples collected during diel periods should be considered when biologists design sampling programs or assess population size structure.
[1] D. Willis,et al. Stock density indices: Development, use, and limitations , 1993 .
[2] K. A. Gustafson. Management Briefs: Approximating Confidence Intervals for Indices of Fish Population Size Structure , 1988 .
[3] D. W. Gabelhouse,et al. A Length‐Categorization System to Assess Fish Stocks , 1984 .
[4] Charles H. Walburg. Some Factors Associated with Fluctuation in Year-class Strength of Sauger, Lewis and Clark Lake, South Dakota , 1972 .