Simulation-based design for resource efficiency of metal production and recycling systems: Cases - copper production and recycling, e-waste (LED lamps) and nickel pig iron

PurposeThis paper illustrates how a product-centric approach to recycling, building on the extensive expertise, knowhow and tools of the mineral-centric classical minerals and metallurgical processing, should be core to Design for Resource Efficiency (DfRE).MethodsProcess simulation (HSC Sim 1974-2014, Outotec's design tool) and environmental software (GaBi 2014) are applied to quantify resource efficiency (RE) in a rigorous manner. These digitalisation tools are linked and will be used to show how the environmental performance of copper primary production, the processing of residues and the recycling of e-waste, e.g. light emitting diode (LED) lamps as well as the production of nickel pig iron can be evaluated. The paper also shows how technologies can be compared relative to a precise thermodynamic and techno-economic baseline.ResultsThe results include simulation-based environmental indicators, exergy, recycling and recovery rates, as well as the qualities and quantities of the recyclates, losses and emissions of materials during production recycling. The complete mass and energy balance simulation provides the mineralogical detail of all streams (both mineral and recyclate as well as offgas and dust) to define and improve environmental assessment, while at the same time revealing the aspects of LCA databases and their results that require improvement. Furthermore, this paper presents an approach for industry to implement life-cycle methods in practice. It shows that the DfRE is all about predicting stream grades and thus is equivalent to Design for Recyclate grade and quality (as this determines whether a recyclate or product stream has economic value and can be treated or processed further). DfRE also reveals especially the grade, composition, minerals etc. of the leakage streams, i.e. diffuse emissions, thus permitting a more precise evaluation of environmental impact.ConclusionsThe prediction of recyclate and stream compositions and grade makes the environmental analysis of systems more precise and will help to expand the detail that defines these flows on environmental databases. This is especially valuable for DfR, where the methodological rigour suggested in this paper is a very necessary addition and requirement for estimating the true environmental impact of product redesigns and the resource efficiency of processing technology and complete recycling systems. The methodology produces mass- and energy-consistent, economically viable best available technique (BAT) process blocks, the inclusion of which on environmental databases will be invaluable in benchmarking technology and systems in terms of estimating the achievable resource efficiency baseline.

[1]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Limits of Design for Recycling and “Sustainability”: A Review , 2011 .

[2]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories , 2001 .

[3]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  THE SIMULATION OF INDUSTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1998 .

[4]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Product-Centric Simulation-Based Design for Recycling: Case of LED Lamp Recycling , 2015, Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy.

[5]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamic Modeling of Zinc Slag Fuming Process in Top-Submerged Lance Smelting Furnace , 2012, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B.

[6]  E. L. Harder,et al.  The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C).

[8]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  Practical handbook of material flow analysis , 2003 .

[9]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant-Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (9 pp + 3 pp) , 2005 .

[10]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice , 2011 .

[11]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[12]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  A Handbook of Industrial Ecology , 2002 .

[13]  Jon Biemer,et al.  Our environmental handprint: The good we do , 2013, 2013 1st IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech).

[14]  Robert Ries,et al.  Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life‐Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches , 2007 .

[15]  Erwin M. Schau,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[16]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Opportunities and limits of recycling: A dynamic-model-based analysis , 2012 .

[17]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant - Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (3 pp) , 2005 .

[18]  David Hunkeler,et al.  The Future of Life Cycle Assessment , 2005 .

[19]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Dynamic performance metrics to assess sustainability and cost effectiveness of integrated urban water systems , 2010 .

[20]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Material-Centric (Aluminum and Copper) and Product-Centric (Cars, WEEE, TV, Lamps, Batteries, Catalysts) Recycling and DfR Rules , 2014 .

[21]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life-Cycle based methods for sustainable product development , 2003 .

[22]  Kari Heiskanen,et al.  Metal recycling: opportunities, limits, infrastructure , 2012 .

[23]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Dynamic modelling of E-waste recycling system performance based on product design , 2010 .

[24]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.