Proangiogenic Potential of a Collagen/Bioactive Glass Substrate

PurposePrevious attempts to stimulate angiogenesis have focused on the delivery of growth factors and cytokines, genes encoding for specific angiogenic inductive proteins or transcription factors, or participating cells. While high concentrations of bioactive glasses have exhibited osteogenic potential, recent studies have demonstrated that low concentrations of particular bioactive glasses are angiogenic. We hypothesized that a well known bioactive glass (Bioglass® 45S5) possesses proangiogenic potential over a limited range of concentrations.Materials and MethodsVarying amounts of Bioglass were loaded into absorbable collagen sponges. The proangiogenic potential of Bioglass was determined by examining the capacity of the soluble products to induce endothelial cell proliferation, tubule formation in a co-culture, and upregulate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production.ResultsWe determined a range of Bioglass concentrations which exhibit proangiogenic potential. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the proangiogenic capacity of this material is related to the soluble dissolution products of Bioglass and the subsequent production of cell-secreted angiogenic factors by stimulated cells.ConclusionsThese studies suggest that this bioactive glass possesses a robust proangiogenic potential, and this strategy may provide an alternative to recombinant inductive growth factors.

[1]  L L Hench,et al.  Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass 45S5 dissolution. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  J. Blaker,et al.  Three-dimensional culture of annulus fibrosus cells within PDLLA/Bioglass composite foam scaffolds: assessment of cell attachment, proliferation and extracellular matrix production. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[3]  Peter Carmeliet,et al.  Manipulating angiogenesis in medicine , 2004, Journal of internal medicine.

[4]  D. Mooney,et al.  Bone engineering by controlled delivery of osteoinductive molecules and cells , 2004, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[5]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[6]  Rebecca Kuntz Willits,et al.  Effect of collagen gel stiffness on neurite extension , 2004, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[7]  Kazuo Tanishita,et al.  Effects of the mechanical properties of collagen gel on the in vitro formation of microvessel networks by endothelial cells. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[8]  P. Gullino,et al.  Ceruloplasmin, copper ions, and angiogenesis. , 1982, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range for the treatment of oral bone defects: a 1-24 month experiment with several materials and particle sizes and size ranges. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  The regulation of osteogenesis by ECM rigidity in MC3T3‐E1 cells requires MAPK activation , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[11]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[12]  Richard M Day,et al.  Bioactive glass stimulates the secretion of angiogenic growth factors and angiogenesis in vitro. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[13]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Principals of neovascularization for tissue engineering. , 2002, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[14]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials , 1971 .

[15]  N. Faucheux,et al.  Differentiation of preosteoblasts using a delivery system with BMPs and bioactive glass microspheres , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[16]  P. Carmeliet Angiogenesis in health and disease , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[17]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[18]  D. Cochran,et al.  Clinical evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  D. Mooney,et al.  Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  M. Bosetti,et al.  The effect of bioactive glasses on bone marrow stromal cells differentiation. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[21]  C. Lewis,et al.  Comparison of three in vitro human ‘angiogenesis’ assays with capillaries formed in vivo , 2004, Angiogenesis.

[22]  H. Blau,et al.  Microenvironmental VEGF concentration, not total dose, determines a threshold between normal and aberrant angiogenesis. , 2004, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[23]  P Ducheyne,et al.  Bioactive glass fiber/polymeric composites bond to bone tissue. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  T. K. Hunt,et al.  Copper-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression and wound healing. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[25]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[26]  Hussila Keshaw,et al.  Release of angiogenic growth factors from cells encapsulated in alginate beads with bioactive glass. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[27]  A R Boccaccini,et al.  Development and in vitro characterisation of novel bioresorbable and bioactive composite materials based on polylactide foams and Bioglass for tissue engineering applications. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[28]  A. Berdal,et al.  Potential of biomimetic surfaces to promote in vitro osteoblast-like cell differentiation. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[29]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Polymeric Growth Factor Delivery Strategies for Tissue Engineering , 2003, Pharmaceutical Research.

[30]  S. Ivanovski,et al.  An immunohistochemical study of matrix molecules associated with barrier membrane-mediated periodontal wound healing. , 2000, Journal of periodontal research.

[31]  Larry L Hench,et al.  Bioactive glasses for in situ tissue regeneration , 2004, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[32]  David J Mooney,et al.  Coating of VEGF-releasing scaffolds with bioactive glass for angiogenesis and bone regeneration. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[33]  A. Kostakis,et al.  Rat Epigastric Flap Survival and VEGF Expression after Local Copper Application , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[34]  R. Mengel,et al.  Bioabsorbable membrane and bioactive glass in the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: results of a 12-month clinical and radiological study. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[35]  Susan X. Hsiong,et al.  Differentiation stage alters matrix control of stem cells. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[36]  David J Mooney,et al.  Temporally regulated delivery of VEGF in vitro and in vivo. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[37]  Jun Yao,et al.  The effect of bioactive glass content on synthesis and bioactivity of composite poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)/bioactive glass substrate for tissue engineering. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[38]  W. Reilly,et al.  Endothelial cell phagokinesis in response to specific metal ions. , 1980, Experimental cell research.

[39]  R. Nicosia,et al.  The thin prep rat aortic ring assay: A modified method for the characterization of angiogenesis in whole mounts , 2004, Angiogenesis.

[40]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[41]  J. Polak,et al.  Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[42]  C. Perry,et al.  Bone repair techniques, bone graft, and bone graft substitutes. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.