Optogenetic tools for in vivo applications in neonatal mice

Spontaneous neural activities exist early in development and their spatiotemporal patterns play important roles in the development of sensory maps such as maps of retinotopy in the visual system. We summarized different optogenetic tools, including transgenic mouse lines, viral-mediated transfection and electroporation methods to enable the expression of light-gated channelrhodopsin (ChR2) in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) before the onset of vision. Patch-clamp and extracellular recording experiments verified that activities of ChR2-expressing cells were precisely manipulated by the patterns of optical stimuli. In chronic stimulation experiments, light-emitting diodes controlled the activity patterns of ChR2-expressing RGCs in vivo. Changes in the retinotopic map in Superior Colliculus (SC) were examined by quantifying the relative sizes of fluorescently labeled target zones. Our results revealed that various optogenetic and optical tools can manipulate retinal activities with precise temporal patterns. These techniques can be readily used in studying the development of the central nervous system of neonatal rodents.

[1]  Mingfeng Li,et al.  TBR1 directly represses Fezf2 to control the laminar origin and development of the corticospinal tract , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  M. Feller,et al.  Mechanisms underlying spontaneous patterned activity in developing neural circuits , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Sanes,et al.  Laminar Restriction of Retinal Ganglion Cell Dendrites and Axons: Subtype-Specific Developmental Patterns Revealed with Transgenic Markers , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Horton.  Disruption of orientation tuning in visual cortex by artificially correlated neuronal activity. , 1997, Survey of ophthalmology.

[5]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Seunghoon Lee,et al.  A transient network of intrinsically bursting starburst cells underlies the generation of retinal waves , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Crair,et al.  An Instructive Role for Patterned Spontaneous Retinal Activity in Mouse Visual Map Development , 2011, Neuron.

[8]  C. Shatz,et al.  Transient period of correlated bursting activity during development of the mammalian retina , 1993, Neuron.

[9]  C. Cepko,et al.  Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Onkar S. Dhande,et al.  Development of Single Retinofugal Axon Arbors in Normal and β2 Knock-Out Mice , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Feng Zhang,et al.  An optical neural interface: in vivo control of rodent motor cortex with integrated fiberoptic and optogenetic technology , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  S. Hodgson,et al.  The human PAX6 gene is mutated in two patients with aniridia , 1992, Nature Genetics.

[13]  D. Hubel,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF CELLS IN STRIATE CORTEX OF VERY YOUNG, VISUALLY INEXPERIENCED KITTENS. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Herwig Baier,et al.  Regulation of axon growth in vivo by activity-based competition , 2005, Nature.

[15]  Chi-Bin Chien,et al.  Synaptic Activity and Activity-Dependent Competition Regulates Axon Arbor Maturation, Growth Arrest, and Territory in the Retinotectal Projection , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  L. Maffei,et al.  Spontaneous impulse activity of rat retinal ganglion cells in prenatal life. , 1988, Science.

[17]  B. Krauskopf,et al.  Proc of SPIE , 2003 .

[18]  J. Grieger,et al.  Adeno-associated virus vectorology, manufacturing, and clinical applications. , 2012, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  C. Cepko,et al.  Controlled expression of transgenes introduced by in vivo electroporation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  G. Feng,et al.  Cell type–specific channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice for optogenetic dissection of neural circuitry function , 2011, Nature Methods.

[21]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Retinotopic Map Refinement Requires Spontaneous Retinal Waves during a Brief Critical Period of Development , 2003, Neuron.

[22]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  A toolbox of Cre-dependent optogenetic transgenic mice for light-induced activation and silencing , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Michael C Crair,et al.  Evidence for an Instructive Role of Retinal Activity in Retinotopic Map Refinement in the Superior Colliculus of the Mouse , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  A. Dizhoor,et al.  Ectopic Expression of a Microbial-Type Rhodopsin Restores Visual Responses in Mice with Photoreceptor Degeneration , 2006, Neuron.

[25]  Gerald J. Sun,et al.  Neuronal circuitry mechanism regulating adult quiescent neural stem cell fate decision , 2012, Nature.

[26]  Michael B. Stadler,et al.  Transcriptional code and disease map for adult retinal cell types , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Feller,et al.  Mechanisms underlying development of visual maps and receptive fields. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.