Mathematical modeling reveals the mechanisms of feedforward regulation in cell fate decisions in budding yeast

The determination of cell fate is one of the key questions of developmental biology. Recent experiments showed that feedforward regulation is a novel feature of regulatory networks that controls reversible cellular transitions. However, the underlying mechanism of feedforward regulation-mediated cell fate decision is still unclear. Therefore, using experimental data, we develop a full mathematical model of the molecular network responsible for cell fate selection in budding yeast. To validate our theoretical model, we first investigate the dynamical behaviors of key proteins at the Start transition point and the G1/S transition point; a crucial three-node motif consisting of cyclin (Cln1/2), Substrate/Subunit Inhibitor of cyclin-dependent protein kinase (Sic1) and cyclin B (Clb5/6) is considered at these points. The rapid switches of these important components between high and low levels at two transition check points are demonstrated reasonably by our model. Many experimental observations about cell fate decision and cell size control are also theoretically reproduced. Interestingly, the feedforward regulation provides a reliable separation between different cell fates. Next, our model reveals that the threshold for the amount of WHIskey (Whi5) removed from the nucleus is higher at the Reentry point in pheromone-arrested cells compared with that at the Start point in cycling cells. Furthermore, we analyze the hysteresis in the cell cycle kinetics in response to changes in pheromone concentration, showing that Cln3 is the primary driver of reentry and Cln1/2 is the secondary driver of reentry. In particular, we demonstrate that the inhibition of Cln1/2 due to the accumulation of Factor ARrest (Far1) directly reinforces arrest. Finally, theoretical work verifies that the three-node coherent feedforward motif created by cell FUSion (Fus3), Far1 and STErile (Ste12) ensures the rapid arrest and reversibility of a cellular state. The combination of our theoretical model and the previous experimental data contributes to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the cell fate decision at the G1 phase in budding yeast and will stimulate further biological experiments in future.

[1]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. , 1974, Science.

[2]  Xiufen Zou,et al.  Identification of the molecular mechanisms for cell-fate selection in budding yeast through mathematical modeling. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[3]  P. Pryciak,et al.  Membrane Localization of Scaffold Proteins Promotes Graded Signaling in the Yeast MAP Kinase Cascade , 2008, Current Biology.

[4]  J. Weiss,et al.  Dynamics of the cell cycle: checkpoints, sizers, and timers. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Frederick R. Cross,et al.  Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Xiufen Zou,et al.  The linear interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic noises ensures a high accuracy of cell fate selection in budding yeast , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[7]  John J Tyson,et al.  Exploring the roles of noise in the eukaryotic cell cycle , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  Identification of a gene necessary for cell cycle arrest by a negative growth factor of yeast: FAR1 is an inhibitor of a G1 cyclin, CLN2 , 1990, Cell.

[9]  Volkan Sevim,et al.  Design Principles of the Yeast G1/S Switch , 2013, PLoS biology.

[10]  Adam P. Rosebrock,et al.  Daughter-Specific Transcription Factors Regulate Cell Size Control in Budding Yeast , 2009, PLoS biology.

[11]  S. Mangan,et al.  Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Xiufen Zou,et al.  Modeling specificity in the yeast MAPK signaling networks. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[14]  Andreas Doncic,et al.  Distinct interactions select and maintain a specific cell fate. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[15]  F. Cross,et al.  Starting the cell cycle: what's the point? , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  R. Yu,et al.  Fus3 generates negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast pheromone response , 2008, Nature.

[17]  A noisy ‘Start' to the cell cycle , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[18]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Unequal division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its implications for the control of cell division , 1977, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  John J. Tyson,et al.  Irreversible cell-cycle transitions are due to systems-level feedback , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  D E Koshland The cell cycle. , 1989, Science.

[21]  J. Hasty,et al.  Regulation of cell signaling dynamics by the protein kinase-scaffold Ste5. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[22]  Andreas Doncic,et al.  Feedforward regulation ensures stability and rapid reversibility of a cellular state. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[23]  E. Furlong The Importance of Being Specified: Cell Fate Decisions and Their Role in Cell Biology , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[24]  J. Skotheim,et al.  Cell Size Control in Yeast , 2012, Current Biology.

[25]  Ya Jia,et al.  Enhancement of tunability of MAPK cascade due to coexistence of processive and distributive phosphorylation mechanisms. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Zhilin Qu,et al.  Multisite phosphorylation and network dynamics of cyclin-dependent kinase signaling in the eukaryotic cell cycle. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[27]  F. Cross,et al.  Negative regulation of FAR1 at the Start of the yeast cell cycle. , 1993, Genes & development.

[28]  Xiufen Zou,et al.  Mathematical models of specificity in cell signaling. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of the yeast pheromone pathway , 2004, Yeast.

[30]  Gilles Charvin,et al.  Origin of Irreversibility of Cell Cycle Start in Budding Yeast , 2010, PLoS biology.

[31]  Xiufen Zou,et al.  Understanding inhibition of viral proteins on type I IFN signaling pathways with modeling and optimization. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  B. Futcher,et al.  Far1 and Fus3 Link the Mating Pheromone Signal Transduction Pathway to Three G1-Phase Cdc28 Kinase Complexes , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[33]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  The Cell Cycle , 1989 .

[34]  F. Cross,et al.  The effects of molecular noise and size control on variability in the budding yeast cell cycle , 2007, Nature.

[35]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast , 2007, Nature.