Effects on Text Understanding and Memory by Types of Display Media: Comparison between E-book Readers and Papers

The aim of this paper is to understand the learning effect by difference of display media and text contents. Thirty six subjects read two types of short texts that are literary text and descriptive one about scientific topic by using tablet computer (iPad) and paper. We compared subjective evaluation about each type of displays, reading speed per characters, score of memory test and comprehension test after reading texts. At first, the result of subjective impressions showed that iPad’s readability has already achieved the equivalent to papers’. Subjects recognized that iPad was superior to paper in terms of display sharpness and easiness of turning pages. On the other hand, subjects felt less fatigue and higher concentration while reading texts on paper. Secondly, significant difference by ANOVA was observed between two types of media on reading speed and word memory test score only using descriptive text. Finally, it is concluded that paper is still higher usability media than tablet computer for understanding sentence. 1. はじめに

[1]  Marcin Szwed,et al.  Unconsciously deciphering handwriting: Subliminal invariance for handwritten words in the visual word form area , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  Carol Bergfeld,et al.  Reading text from computer screens , 1987, CSUR.

[3]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  The myth of the paperless office , 2001 .

[4]  David J. Oborne,et al.  Reading from Screen versus Paper: There is No Difference , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[5]  Tom Peters The Future of Reading. , 2009 .

[6]  Christine Reid,et al.  The Myth of the Paperless Office , 2003, J. Documentation.

[7]  P Wright,et al.  Computer anxiety: a comparison of pen-based personal digital assistants, conventional computer and paper assessment of mood and performance. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[8]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Gender, Pair Composition and Computer Versus Paper Presentations of an English Language Task , 2000 .

[9]  William C. Treurniet,et al.  Extended Reading of Continuous Text on Television Screens , 1982 .

[10]  Shirley C. Feldmann,et al.  Reading Comprehension of Elementary, Junior High and High School Students on Print vs. Microcomputer-Generated Text , 1988 .

[11]  Kate J. Garland,et al.  Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: is workload another test mode effect? , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Fortune favors the ( ): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes , 2011, Cognition.

[13]  G. E. Rice,et al.  Examining Constructs in Reading Comprehension Using Two Presentation Modes: Paper vs. Computer , 1994 .

[14]  Susanne Askwall,et al.  Computer Supported Reading vs Reading Text on Paper: A Comparison of Two Reading Situations , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[15]  Shirley C. Feldmann,et al.  Reading Comprehension of High School Students on Print vs. Microcomputer-Generated Text. , 1987 .

[16]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature , 1992 .

[17]  Jacques Barzun,et al.  The Future of Reading. , 1978 .