A user-driven free speech application for anonymous and verified online, public group discourse

Online social networks are major hubs of communications that are used to share information by societies worldwide. However, the ability to freely communicate on these platforms is increasingly restricted in countries across the globe and existing technological solutions do not fully address the needs of affected communities. In this paper we explore the design process of SecurePost, a novel tool that allows verified group anonymity to those communicating publicly on online social networks. We present survey-based research and ethnographic interviews of communities vulnerable to censorship conducted in Zambia, Turkey, and Mongolia between 2013 to 2016. We use analysis of this data to ground our work. We explore needs and requirements of users such as modes of censorship, resistance to network disruption, and appropriate platform consideration. We outline our technological solution and expand on how on-the-ground research of user communities guides technological requirements.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory methodology: An overview. , 1994 .

[2]  Nick Mathewson,et al.  Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router , 2004, USENIX Security Symposium.

[3]  Çev. Fatih Canata.  Sahte Haberleri Nasıl Saptarız , 2017 .

[4]  Stefan Lindskog,et al.  How the Great Firewall of China is Blocking Tor , 2012, FOCI.

[5]  Yael Tauman Kalai,et al.  How to Leak a Secret: Theory and Applications of Ring Signatures , 2001, Essays in Memory of Shimon Even.

[6]  Elizabeth M. Belding-Royer,et al.  Limits to Internet Freedoms: Being Heard in an Increasingly Authoritarian World , 2017, LIMITS.

[7]  Marco Chiesa,et al.  Analysis of country-wide internet outages caused by censorship , 2011, IMC '11.

[8]  M. Gentzkow,et al.  Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election , 2017 .

[9]  Michelle R. Hebl,et al.  Formal and Interpersonal Discrimination: A Field Study of Bias Toward Homosexual Applicants , 2002 .

[10]  Joss Wright,et al.  Internet Filtering in Liberal Democracies , 2012, FOCI.

[11]  Fatih Canata.  How to Spot Fake News ? , 2016 .

[12]  Index , 1999, Neuroscience.

[13]  Emiliano De Cristofaro,et al.  Censorship in the Wild: Analyzing Internet Filtering in Syria , 2014, Internet Measurement Conference.

[14]  J. Alex Halderman,et al.  Internet Censorship in Iran: A First Look , 2013, FOCI.

[15]  Rahul Mukherjee,et al.  From platform jumping to self-censorship: internet freedom, social media, and circumvention practices in Zambia , 2017 .

[16]  Benjamin Edelman,et al.  Internet Filtering in China , 2003, IEEE Internet Comput..

[17]  David Chaum,et al.  Group Signatures , 1991, EUROCRYPT.

[18]  “I Have the Government in My Pocket…”: Social Media Users in Turkey, Transmit-Trap Dynamics, and Struggles Over Internet Freedom , 2017 .

[19]  Eric Puybaret,et al.  Universal Declaration of Human Rights , 2006 .

[20]  Sanja Kelly,et al.  Freedom on the net 2015: privatizing censorship, eroding privacy , 2015 .

[21]  Zubair Nabi.  The Anatomy of Web Censorship in Pakistan , 2013, FOCI.

[22]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  SecurePost: Verified Group-Anonymity on Social Media , 2017, FOCI @ USENIX Security Symposium.

[23]  Minaxi Gupta,et al.  Five Incidents, One Theme: Twitter Spam as a Weapon to Drown Voices of Protest , 2013, FOCI.

[24]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Uncovering social network sybils in the wild , 2011, IMC '11.

[25]  David Boersema,et al.  UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (1948) , 2019, The Rights of Refugees under International Law.

[26]  D. Rennie.  Grounded Theory Methodology , 1998 .

[27]  Bryan C. Semaan,et al.  A Confucian Look at Internet Censorship in China , 2017, INTERACT.

[28]  Margaret E. Roberts,et al.  How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression , 2013, American Political Science Review.

[29]  Jedidiah R. Crandall,et al.  ConceptDoppler: a weather tracker for internet censorship , 2007, CCS '07.