Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering

Feature-based control processes guide attention towards objects with target features in visual search. While these processes are assumed to operate globally across the entire visual field, it remains controversial whether target-matching objects at task-irrelevant locations can be excluded from attentional selection, especially when spatial attention is already narrowly focused elsewhere. We investigated whether probe stimuli at irrelevant lateral locations capture attention when they precede search displays where targets are defined either by a specific feature (colour or orientation) or by a colour/orientation conjunction by measuring N2pc components (an electrophysiological marker of attentional target selection) to these probes. Reliable N2pcs were triggered by probes not only in the feature search tasks but also when participants searched for feature conjunctions, in spite of the fact that conjunction search requires focal spatial attention. Analogous N2pc results were found in the absence of any spatial uncertainty about the location of conjunctively defined targets, which always appeared at fixation. These results show that rapid attentional capture by objects with target-matching features cannot be prevented by top-down spatial filtering mechanisms, and confirm that feature-based attentional guidance processes operate in a spatially global fashion.

[1]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4 , 2005, Science.

[2]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[5]  S. Treue,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[6]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M. Eimer The neural basis of attentional control in visual search , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Perceptual load alters visual excitability. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[11]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  Interactions between space-based and feature-based attention. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Eimer,et al.  The spatially global control of attentional target selection in visual search , 2017 .

[14]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Tracking the Location of Visuospatial Attention in a Contingent Capture Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[24]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention , 2000 .

[26]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.