Analyzing thresholds and efficiency with hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression

ABSTRACT Ideal observer analysis is a fundamental tool used widely in vision science for analyzing the efficiency with which a cognitive or perceptual system uses available information. The performance of an ideal observer provides a formal measure of the amount of information in a given experiment. The ratio of human to ideal performance is then used to compute efficiency, a construct that can be directly compared across experimental conditions while controlling for the differences due to the stimuli and/or task specific demands. In previous research using ideal observer analysis, the effects of varying experimental conditions on efficiency have been tested using ANOVAs and pairwise comparisons. In this work, we present a model that combines Bayesian estimates of psychometric functions with hierarchical logistic regression for inference about both unadjusted human performance metrics and efficiencies. Our approach improves upon the existing methods by constraining the statistical analysis using a standard model connecting stimulus intensity to human observer accuracy and by accounting for variability in the estimates of human and ideal observer performance scores. This allows for both individual and group level inferences.

[1]  Jason M. Gold,et al.  Characterizing perceptual learning with external noise , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Heidi Hofer,et al.  Trichromatic reconstruction from the interleaved cone mosaic: Bayesian model and the color appearance of small spots. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[3]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of different image fusion schemes , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan , 2014 .

[5]  M. Friedman The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance , 1937 .

[6]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of different image fusion schemes , 2003 .

[7]  W. K. Krebs,et al.  Visibility of road hazards in thermal, visible, and sensor-fused night-time imagery. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[9]  J. Gold,et al.  The Impact of Symmetry on the Efficiency of Human Face Perception , 2017, Perception.

[10]  O. Cappé,et al.  Population Monte Carlo , 2004 .

[11]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[12]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[14]  D. W. Zimmerman,et al.  Relative Power of the Wilcoxon Test, the Friedman Test, and Repeated-Measures ANOVA on Ranks , 1993 .

[15]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[16]  W. Geisler Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. , 1989 .

[17]  Jiqiang Guo,et al.  Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[18]  P. Bennett,et al.  Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers , 1999, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Balding,et al.  Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. , 2002, Genetics.

[20]  Brandon M. Turner,et al.  Approximate Bayesian computation with differential evolution , 2012 .

[21]  Fairul Mohd-Zaid,et al.  The effect of multispectral image fusion enhancement on human efficiency , 2017, Cognitive research: principles and implications.

[22]  Wendy L. Braje,et al.  Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise , 1995, Vision Research.

[23]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  The effects of face inversion and contrast-reversal on efficiency and internal noise , 2008, Vision Research.

[24]  H. Jeffreys An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems , 1946, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[25]  Edwin T. Jaynes,et al.  Prior Probabilities , 1968, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[26]  F. Urban The method of constant stimuli and its generalizations. , 1910 .

[27]  Alessandro Moscatelli,et al.  Modeling psychophysical data at the population-level: the generalized linear mixed model. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[28]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  W. Geisler,et al.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research , 2011, Vision Research.

[30]  Frank Jäkel,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychometric functions. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[31]  A. Watson,et al.  QUEST+: A general multidimensional Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[32]  D. Kersten,et al.  Three-dimensional symmetric shapes are discriminated more efficiently than asymmetric ones. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[33]  Jun Lu,et al.  An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[35]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[36]  Jarrett D. Barker,et al.  The efficiency of dynamic and static facial expression recognition. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[37]  T. Wickens Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[38]  Kenneth Knoblauch,et al.  Modeling Psychophysical Data in R , 2012 .

[39]  Joseph W. Houpt,et al.  The perceptual processing of fused multi-spectral imagery , 2016, Cognitive research: principles and implications.

[40]  Randolph Blake,et al.  The efficiency of biological motion perception. , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .