Sense of Presence in a VR-Based Study on Behavioral Compliance with Warnings

Recent researches suggest that Virtual Reality (VR) is amongst the best tools for examining behavioral compliance with warnings, therefore overcoming some ethical and methodological constrains that have been limiting this type of research. Yet, such evaluation using VR requires both usable and engaging virtual environments (VEs). This study examines the sense of presence experienced by the participants after having been immersed in a VE designed for evaluating the effect of sign type (static vs. dynamic) on compliance. The VR simulation tested here allowed participants to perform a realistic work-related task and an emergency egress, during which they were supposed to interact with warnings and exit signs. A neutral condition (i.e., no/minimal signs) was used as a control condition. Subjective and objective data were gathered from two sources, respectively, i.e., a post-hoc questionnaire administered to the participants, and a video analysis of the participants’ interaction behavior during the VR simulation. Results reveal high levels of presence across the three experimental conditions.

[1]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Handbook of Warnings , 2006 .

[2]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[4]  G. Riva,et al.  Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurements of User Presence in Synthetic Environments , 2003 .

[5]  Philippe Coiffet,et al.  Virtual Reality Technology , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[7]  Francisco Rebelo,et al.  Behavioral compliance for dynamic versus static signs in an immersive virtual environment. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Behavioral Compliance in Virtual Reality: Effects of Warning Type , 2010 .

[9]  Agali Mert,et al.  Letter to the editor : Presence in virtual environment , 2009 .

[10]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Ernesto Filgueiras,et al.  Human Interaction Data Acquisition Software for Virtual Reality: A User-Centered Design Approach , 2010 .

[12]  Kevin J. Williams,et al.  Behavioral Compliance: Theory, Methodology, and Results. , 2006 .

[13]  Marc M. Sebrechts,et al.  HANDBOOK OF VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS , 2014 .

[14]  Mark Lehto,et al.  A review of: “Virtual Reality Technology” Grigore Burdea and Philippe Coiffet John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994 , 1996 .

[15]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Virtual Reality and its potential for evaluating warning compliance , 2010 .

[16]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  John M. Flach,et al.  The Reality of Experience: Gibson's Way , 1998, Presence.

[18]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .