Face adaptation aftereffects reveal anterior medial temporal cortex role in high level category representation

Previous studies have shown reductions of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal in response to repetition of specific visual stimuli. We examined how adaptation affects the neural responses associated with categorization behavior, using face adaptation aftereffects. Adaptation to a given facial category biases categorization towards non-adapted facial categories in response to presentation of ambiguous morphs. We explored a hypothesis, posed by recent psychophysical studies, that these adaptation-induced categorizations are mediated by activity in relatively advanced stages within the occipitotemporal visual processing stream. Replicating these studies, we find that adaptation to a facial expression heightens perception of non-adapted expressions. Using comparable behavioral methods, we also show that adaptation to a specific identity heightens perception of a second identity in morph faces. We show both expression and identity effects to be associated with heightened anterior medial temporal lobe activity, specifically when perceiving the non-adapted category. These regions, incorporating bilateral anterior ventral rhinal cortices, perirhinal cortex and left anterior hippocampus are regions previously implicated in high-level visual perception. These categorization effects were not evident in fusiform or occipital gyri, although activity in these regions was reduced to repeated faces. The findings suggest that adaptation-induced perception is mediated by activity in regions downstream to those showing reductions due to stimulus repetition.

[1]  R. Desimone,et al.  Clustering of perirhinal neurons with similar properties following visual experience in adult monkeys , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  B. Murphy,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , .

[4]  J. Rodd,et al.  Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  A. Young,et al.  Adaptation effects in facial expression recognition , 2004 .

[6]  E. Rolls,et al.  Selective Perceptual Impairments After Perirhinal Cortex Ablation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Alessandro Treves,et al.  Modelling adaptation aftereffects in associative memory , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[8]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission , 1999, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Lederberg,et al.  Size Adaptation : A New Aftereffect , 1969 .

[10]  C. Clifford,et al.  Pulling Faces: An Investigation of the Face-Distortion Aftereffect , 2003, Perception.

[11]  Charles L. Wilson,et al.  Single Neuron Activity in Human Hippocampus and Amygdala during Recognition of Faces and Objects , 1997, Neuron.

[12]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. , 1933 .

[14]  R. Henson,et al.  A familiarity signal in human anterior medial temporal cortex? , 2003, Hippocampus.

[15]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  P. Dodwell,et al.  A functional theory of the McCollough effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[17]  Adriane E Seiffert,et al.  Functional MRI studies of human visual motion perception: texture, luminance, attention and after-effects. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  N. Miller,et al.  A Brief Temporal Gradient of Retrograde Amnesia Independent of Situational Change , 1965, Science.

[19]  C. Koch,et al.  Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.

[20]  C. Koch,et al.  Category-specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  View-independent coding of face identity in frontal and temporal cortices is modulated by familiarity: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. , 1999 .

[24]  H. Wilson,et al.  The nature of synthetic face adaptation , 2005, Vision Research.

[25]  F. Fang,et al.  Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  J. Ringo Stimulus specific adaptation in inferior temporal and medial temporal cortex of the monkey , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. , 2005, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[28]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[29]  Christof Koch,et al.  Face Adaptation Depends on Seeing the Face , 2005, Neuron.

[30]  H. Wallach,et al.  Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .

[31]  Éva M. Bankó,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  K. Ziemons,et al.  The Network of Brain Areas Involved in the Motion Aftereffect , 2000, NeuroImage.

[33]  H. Barlow,et al.  Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effects , 1963, Nature.

[34]  C. McCollough Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1965, Science.

[35]  Katsuki Nakamura,et al.  Visual response properties of neurons in the parahippocampal cortex of monkeys. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: recollection, familiarity, and novelty. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  M. Buckley The Role of the Perirhinal Cortex and Hippocampus in Learning, Memory, and Perception , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[38]  K. Nakamura,et al.  The primate temporal pole: its putative role in object recognition and memory , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[39]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Probing the Visual Representation of Faces With Adaptation , 2006, Psychological science.

[41]  Sheng He,et al.  Viewer-Centered Object Representation in the Human Visual System Revealed by Viewpoint Aftereffects , 2005, Neuron.

[42]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  The functional anatomy of the McCollough contingent colour after-effect. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[43]  Joseph S. Gati,et al.  Perception of the Mccollough Effect Correlates with Activity in Extrastriate Cortex: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1999 .

[44]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[45]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Specialization in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe , 2005 .

[46]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Perceptual deficits in amnesia: challenging the medial temporal lobe ‘mnemonic’ view , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  J. Gibson,et al.  ADAPTATION , AFTEREFFECT AND CONTRAST IN THE PERCEPTION OF TILTED LINES , 2004 .

[52]  J. Rodd,et al.  Anteromedial temporal cortex supports fine-grained differentiation among objects. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[54]  J. Frisby Seeing: Illusion, Brain and Mind , 1979 .

[55]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[56]  Sergio E. Chaigneau,et al.  THE SIMILARITY-IN-TOPOGRAPHY PRINCIPLE: RECONCILING THEORIES OF CONCEPTUAL DEFICITS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[57]  D. P. Andrews Error-correcting Perceptual Mechanisms , 1964 .

[58]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Dissociating intentional learning from relative novelty responses in the medial temporal lobe , 2005, NeuroImage.

[59]  Emmanuel A Stamatakis,et al.  The Anatomy of Object Processing: The Role of Anteromedial Temporal Cortex , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[60]  Lisa M Saksida,et al.  The Perceptual-Mnemonic/Feature Conjunction Model of Perirhinal Cortex Function , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[61]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition , 1997, Cognition.