Fluidized Bed Desulfurization using Lime Obtained after Slow Calcination of Limestone Particles

Abstract In this work we have tested the fluidized bed desulfurization performance of lime particles obtained by means of a limestone slow calcination pre-treatment technique. This performance was compared to that of the parent untreated limestone particles. The occurrence of particle fragmentation and attrition during the fluidized bed operation was also investigated with a specific test protocol for both raw limestone and pre-treated lime sorbent. Two particle size ranges were tested under typical fluidized bed coal combustion conditions ( T  = 850 °C; SO 2  = 1800 ppm). The experiments were complemented by porosimetric and morphological (SEM) analyses of the sorbent. Results showed that limestone pre-treatment was able to preserve the high mechanical strength of the parent particles as opposed to the fast in situ calcination typically active in fluidized beds. In addition, a high calcium reactivity and final conversion were observed for the pre-treated lime particles, leading to a SO 2 capture capacity per unit mass of sorbent much higher than that obtained with the untreated limestone. Simple economic evaluations suggest that the use of the pre-treated lime in place of limestone can involve significant economies for fluidized bed coal combustor operators.

[1]  A. Scaroni,et al.  The calcination and sulphation behaviour of sorbents in fluidized bed combustion , 1991 .

[2]  K. Dam-Johansen,et al.  High-temperature reaction between sulphur dioxide and limestone—I. Comparison of limestones in two laboratory reactors and a pilot plant , 1991 .

[3]  P. Salatino,et al.  The influence of sorbent properties and reaction temperature on sorbent attrition, sulfur uptake, and particle sulfation pattern during fluidized-bed desulfurization , 2002 .

[4]  J. Grace,et al.  Crystallization and Fracture: Product Layer Diffusion in Sulfation of Calcined Limestone , 2004 .

[5]  Fabrizio Scala,et al.  Comminution of limestone during batch fluidized‐bed calcination and sulfation , 1997 .

[6]  P. Salatino,et al.  Assessment of ettringite from hydrated FBC residues as a sorbent for fluidized bed desulphurization , 2003 .

[7]  Edward J. Anthony,et al.  Sulfation phenomena in fluidized bed combustion systems , 2001 .

[8]  P. Salatino,et al.  Attrition of Limestone by Impact Loading in Fluidized Beds , 2007 .

[9]  Qing Liu,et al.  An experimental study on the primary fragmentation and attrition of limestones in a fluidized bed , 2010 .

[10]  K. Østergaard,et al.  High-temperature reaction between sulphur dioxide and limestone. II, An improved experimental basis for a mathematical model , 1991 .

[11]  Edward J. Anthony,et al.  Reactivation of limestone sorbents in FBC for SO2 capture , 2007 .

[12]  P. Salatino,et al.  Attrition of sorbents during fluidized bed calcination and sulphation , 2000 .

[13]  Fabio Montagnaro,et al.  The influence of temperature on limestone sulfation and attrition under fluidized bed combustion conditions , 2010 .

[14]  P. Salatino,et al.  Sulphation of limestones in a fluidized bed combustor: The relationship between particle attrition and microstructure , 2008 .

[15]  A. D. Benedetto,et al.  Modelling attrition of limestone during calcination and sulfation in a fluidized bed reactor , 1998 .

[16]  John R. Grace,et al.  Study of limestone particle impact attrition , 2007 .