Virtual-reality as a Simulation Tool for Non-humanoid Social Robots

Evaluating the interaction between people and non-humanoid robots requires advanced physical prototyping, and in many cases is limited to lab setting with Wizard-of-Oz control. Virtual Reality (VR) was suggested as a simulation tool, allowing for fast, flexible and iterative design processes. In this controlled study, we evaluated whether VR is a valid platform for testing social interaction between people and non-humanoid robots. Our quantitative findings indicate that social interpretations associated with two types of gestures of a robotic object are similar in virtual and physical interactions with the robot, suggesting that the core aspects of social interaction with non-humanoid robots are preserved in a VR simulation. The impact of this work to the CHI community is in indicating the potential of VR as a platform for initial evaluations of social experiences with non-humanoid robots, including interaction studies that involve different facets of the social experience.

[1]  Paul A. Jennings,et al.  Development of a Drive-in Driver-in-the-Loop Fully Immersive Driving Simulator for Virtual Validation of Automotive Systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[2]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Jan Sprenger,et al.  Testing a Precise Null Hypothesis: The Case of Lindley’s Paradox , 2013, Philosophy of Science.

[4]  Philippe Fuchs,et al.  An Immersive Virtual Reality System for Semi-autonomous Driving Simulation: A Comparison between Realistic and 6-DoF Controller-based Interaction , 2017, ICCAE '17.

[5]  Mel Slater,et al.  Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality , 2016, Front. Robot. AI.

[6]  Hadas Erel,et al.  Robots are Always Social: Robotic Movements are Automatically Interpreted as Social Cues , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Mason Bretan,et al.  Chronicles of a Robotic Musical Companion , 2014, NIME.

[8]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Character Actor , 2018, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[9]  Alexis Paljic,et al.  Ecological Validity of Virtual Reality: Three Use Cases , 2017, ICIAP Workshops.

[10]  Li Rui,et al.  Comparing Human-Robot Proxemics between Virtual Reality and the Real World , 2018 .

[11]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A Growing Research Field , 2007 .

[12]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  The Greeting Machine: An Abstract Robotic Object for Opening Encounters , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[13]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies in HRI , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[14]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[15]  Nadine Miner,et al.  An interactive virtual reality simulation system for robot control and operator training , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Rachid Alami,et al.  How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context , 2006, HRI '06.

[17]  Wendy Ju.  Approachability : How People Interpret Automatic Door Movement as Gesture , 2008 .

[18]  L. M. M.-T..  Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[19]  Ali Meghdari,et al.  Virtual Reality Social Robot Platform: A Case Study on Arash Social Robot , 2018, ICSR.

[20]  Philippe Fuchs,et al.  Assessing the acceptability of human-robot co-presence on assembly lines: A comparison between actual situations and their virtual reality counterparts , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[21]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[22]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[23]  Klaus H. Hinrichs,et al.  Taxonomy and Implementation of Redirection Techniques for Ubiquitous Passive Haptic Feedback , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Cyberworlds.

[24]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[25]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Designing robots with movement in mind , 2014, Journal of Human-Robot Interaction.

[27]  Tatsuo Arai,et al.  Comparison of human psychology for real and virtual mobile manipulators , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[28]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  A Simple Nod of the Head: The Effect of Minimal Robot Movements on Children's Perception of a Low-Anthropomorphic Robot , 2017, CHI.

[29]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.