Purpose Ferro niobium (FeNb) is a metallic alloy whose industrial use has been increasing steadily in the last decades. This work aims to systematize the available information on FeNb production, provide its inventory data and generate its first technologically representative publicly available life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). Methods The production of 1 kg of FeNb from pyrochlore in the baseline year 2017 was modelled following a cradle-to-gate approach. Primary information on mass, energy and water flows was collected when possible from the Brazilian leading FeNb supplier, CBMM (80% of the world market). The CML method (CML-IA 4.7) was applied for the impact assessment including global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), ozone layer depletion potential (ODP), abiotic depletion potential (fossil and elemental) (ADP fossil and ADP elemental ) and photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP). Results and discussion The first stage of pyrochlore processing (pyrochlore ore extraction, mechanical processing and flotation) and the last stage (aluminothermic reaction) bear the highest impact in all analyzed CML impact categories. The primary aluminium consumption has the most important contribution in five out of seven impact categories (50% in ADP fossil , 55% in AP, 35% in EP, 57% in GWP and 40% in POCP). In this sense, the industry should promote a higher share of secondary aluminium in the production process. Also, the impact from electricity consumption and processing chemicals showed to be relevant. Conclusions This work is the first LCIA on ferro niobium to be published with representative, high-quality data. A dataset was produced in order to enable ferro niobium to be incorporated to future LCIA-modelling.
[1]
Nicholas Santero,et al.
Harmonization of LCA methodologies for the metal and mining industry
,
2016,
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.
[2]
M. Eckelman,et al.
Life Cycle Assessment of Metals: A Scientific Synthesis
,
2014,
PloS one.
[3]
M. Schulz,et al.
Life cycle assessment of zircon sand
,
2019,
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.
[4]
J. Oliveira,et al.
Kinetics of pyrochlore flotation from Araxá mineral deposits
,
2001
.
[5]
Angelo Antoci,et al.
Rural Poor Economies and Foreign Investors: An Opportunity or a Risk?
,
2014,
PloS one.
[6]
Melting And Purification Of Niobium
,
2007
.
[7]
A. R. Coutinho,et al.
Life cycle assessment of niobium: A mining and production case study in Brazil
,
2019,
Minerals Engineering.
[8]
Vanessa Bach,et al.
Approach to qualify decision support maturity of new versus established impact assessment methods—demonstrated for the categories acidification and eutrophication
,
2017,
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.
[9]
E. Nikishina,et al.
Niobium and tantalum: State of the world market, application fields, and sources of raw materials. Part 2
,
2014,
Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals.
[10]
J. F. Papp,et al.
Niobium and tantalum
,
2017
.
[11]
C. Gupta,et al.
Extractive metallurgy of niobium
,
1994
.