Decentralized Primary Frequency Control in Power Networks

We augment existing generator-side primary frequency control with load-side control that are local, ubiquitous, and continuous. The mechanisms on both the generator and the load sides are decentralized in that their control decisions are functions of locally measurable frequency deviations. These local algorithms interact over the network through nonlinear power flows. We design the local frequency feedback control so that any equilibrium point of the closed-loop system is the solution to an optimization problem that minimizes the total generation cost and user disutility subject to power balance across entire network. With Lyapunov method we derive a sufficient condition ensuring an equilibrium point of the closed-loop system is asymptotically stable. Simulation demonstrates improvement in both the transient and steady-state performance over the traditional control only on the generators, even when the total control capacity remains the same.

[1]  François Bouffard,et al.  Decentralized Demand-Side Contribution to Primary Frequency Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Compositional stability analysis based on dual decomposition , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[3]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Design and Stability of Load-Side Primary Frequency Control in Power Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  D.G. Infield,et al.  Stabilization of Grid Frequency Through Dynamic Demand Control , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  A.R. Bergen,et al.  A Structure Preserving Model for Power System Stability Analysis , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[6]  Zhihua Qu,et al.  Toward a globally robust decentralized control for large-scale power systems , 1997, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[7]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Achieving Controllability of Electric Loads , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Na Li,et al.  Connecting Automatic Generation Control and Economic Dispatch From an Optimization View , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[9]  D. Siljak,et al.  Robust Decentralized Turbine/Governor Control Using Linear Matrix Inequalities , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[10]  Anuradha M. Annaswamy,et al.  A hierarchical transactive control architecture for renewables integration in Smart Grids , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[11]  Enrique Mallada Steven H. Low Distributed Frequency-Preserving Optimal Load Control , 2014 .

[12]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  A structure preserving energy function for power system transient stability analysis , 1985 .

[13]  Hadi Saadat,et al.  Power Systems Analysis , 2002 .

[14]  Daniel Trudnowski,et al.  Frequency and stability control using decentralized intelligent loads: Benefits and pitfalls , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[15]  Donald J. Hammerstrom,et al.  Pacific Northwest GridWise™ Testbed Demonstration Projects; Part II. Grid Friendly™ Appliance Project , 2007 .

[16]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  From Hierarchical to Open Access Electric Power Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  Na Li,et al.  Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[18]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  Breaking the Hierarchy: Distributed Control and Economic Optimality in Microgrids , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[19]  Alec Brooks,et al.  Demand Dispatch , 2010, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[20]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[21]  Fred Schweppe,et al.  Homeostatic Utility Control , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.