Research 2.0: Improving participation in online research communities

Web 2.0 thinking and technologies create a number of new opportunities to conduct research broadly labeled as Research 2.0. Research 2.0 is a growing area of academic and commercial interest, which includes research undertaken in online research communities. This research in progress paper explores the practice of online research communities using a case study example operated by the commercial market research company Virtual Surveys Limited (VSL) in the UK on behalf of their client United Biscuits UK Ltd. The preliminary findings are based on VSL and academics working together to improve the online research community participants’ response rate and the quality of contributions. Data collected for this study is based on meetings, participant observation, and a pilot survey of United Biscuits online research community (snackrs.com) members. Using the responses of 112 snackrs.com community members, a preliminary typology of motivational factors is proposed. This can be used to refine the recruitment and development of activities in an online research community. Also, a model for supporting online research communities to ensure longitudinal engagement based on an adaptation of Salmon’s (2004) 5 Stage Model for e-moderation is proposed, extending the 5 stages to 7 – adding the stages of selection and disengagement

[1]  Daniel V. Eastmond E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online , 2003 .

[2]  E. Wenger Communities of practice: learning as a social system , 1998 .

[3]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  B. J. Oates,et al.  Researching Information Systems and Computing , 2005 .

[5]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  User loyalty and online communities: why members of online communities are not faithful , 2008, INTETAIN '08.

[6]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[8]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Using Web Analytics to Measure the Activity in a Research-Oriented Online Community , 2004, AMCIS.

[9]  Pam. Moule,et al.  Challenging the five-stage model for e-learning: A new approach , 2007 .

[10]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Kathy Lynch,et al.  Scholarly Collaboration Across Time Zones , 2008 .

[12]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[13]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[14]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[15]  Oded Nov,et al.  What motivates Wikipedians? , 2007, CACM.

[16]  Pete Comley Online Research Communities - a User Guide , 2008 .