Surveillance of patients with breast cancer after curative-intent primary treatment: current practice patterns.

PURPOSE To determine how physicians monitor their patients after initial curative-intent treatment for breast carcinoma. METHODS A custom-designed survey instrument with four idealized patient vignettes (TNM stages 0 to III) was e-mailed to the 3,245 members of ASCO who had identified themselves as having breast cancer as a major focus of their practice. Respondents were asked how they use 12 specific follow-up modalities during post-treatment years 1 to 5 for each vignette. Mean, median, standard deviation, and range of the intensity of use for each modality were calculated for the four vignettes. RESULTS Of the 3,245 ASCO members surveyed, 1,012 (31%) responded. Of these, 915 (90%) were evaluable and were included in our analysis. Office visit, mammogram, complete blood count, and liver function tests were the most commonly recommended surveillance modalities. There was marked variation in surveillance intensity. For example, office visit was recommended 4.1 ± 2.2 times (mean ± SD) in year 1 after curative treatment of a patient with stage III breast cancer. Similar variation was observed for all modalities. CONCLUSIONS The intensity of post-treatment surveillance performed by ASCO members caring for patients with breast cancer varies markedly despite evidence from well-designed, adequately powered randomized controlled trials. Many modalities not recommended by ASCO guidelines are used routinely, which constitutes evidence of overuse. The lack of consensus is likely due to multiple factors and constitutes an appealing target for interventions to rationalize surveillance.

[1]  R. Moineddin,et al.  Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. , 2010, Journal of oncology practice.

[2]  Yun Yen,et al.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[3]  D. Coyle,et al.  Outcomes of surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a population-based case series , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  R. Gelber,et al.  Patterns of recurrence of early breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a therapeutic target for a quarter of a century , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[5]  P. Ganz,et al.  Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  T. Cooke,et al.  Follow-up in breast cancer: does routine clinical examination improve outcome? A systematic review of the literature , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  B. Miller,et al.  Measures of racial/ethnic health disparities in cancer mortality rates and the influence of socioeconomic status. , 2007, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[8]  T. Lash,et al.  Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  T. Whelan,et al.  Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  T. Lash,et al.  Reduced Mortality Rate Associated with Annual Mammograms after Breast Cancer Therapy , 2006, The breast journal.

[12]  Y Wang,et al.  Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials , 2005, The Lancet.

[13]  D. Jeffe,et al.  Disparities related to socioeconomic status and access to medical care remain in the United States among women who never had a mammogram , 2003, Cancer Causes & Control.

[14]  L. Donaldson,et al.  FOLLOW‐UP OF BREAST CANCER: TIME FOR A NEW APPROACH? , 2001, International journal of clinical practice.

[15]  D. Mant,et al.  Routine follow-up of breast cancer in primary care: randomized trial. , 1997 .

[16]  D. Mant,et al.  Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial , 1996, BMJ.

[17]  B. Cady Cost-effective preoperative evaluation, operative treatment, and postoperative follow-up in the breast cancer patient. , 1996, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[18]  C. J. Rosenquist,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies. , 1995, JAMA.

[19]  M. Indelli,et al.  Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators. , 1994, JAMA.

[20]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Intensive Diagnostic Follow-up After Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial , 1994 .

[21]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. , 1994, JAMA.

[22]  G. Kerr,et al.  Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast. , 1985, British medical journal.

[23]  Csusb Volume 1, 2009 , 2009 .

[24]  A. Liberati,et al.  Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[25]  W. Donegan,et al.  Screening for recurrent breast cancer--its effectiveness and prognostic value. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.