Gain of the human dura in vivo and its effects on invasive brain signal feature detection

Invasive brain signal recordings generally rely on bioelectrodes implanted on the cortex underneath the dura. Subdural recordings have strong advantages in terms of bandwidth, spatial resolution and signal quality. However, subdural electrodes also have the drawback of compromising the long-term stability of such implants and heighten the risk of infection. Epidurally implanted electrodes might provide a viable alternative to subdural electrodes, offering a compromise between signal quality and invasiveness. Determining the feasibility of epidural electrode implantation for e.g., clinical research, brain-computer interfacing (BCI) and cognitive experiments, requires the characterization of the electrical properties of the dura, and its effect on signal feature detection. In this paper we report measurements of brain signal attenuation by the human dura in vivo. In addition, we use signal detection theory to study how the presence of the dura between the sources and the recording electrodes affects signal power features in motor BCI experiments. For noise levels typical of clinical brain signal recording equipment, we observed no detrimental effects on signal feature detection due to the dura. Subdural recordings were found to be more robust with respect to increased instrumentation noise level as compared to their epidural counterpart nonetheless. Our findings suggest that epidural electrode implantation is a viable alternative to subdural implants from the feature detection viewpoint.

[1]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Design and operation of an EEG-based brain-computer interface with digital signal processing technology , 1997 .

[2]  C. Elger,et al.  Iatrogenic brain prolapse , 1997, Neurology.

[3]  T. Wickens Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-Based Communication: Evaluation of Alternative Signal Prediction Methods - EEG-basierte Kommunikation: Evaluierung alternativer Methoden zur Signalprädiktion , 1997, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[5]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  P.R. Kennedy,et al.  Computer control using human intracortical local field potentials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  José del R. Millán,et al.  An Introduction to Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2007 .

[9]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1987 .

[10]  F Babiloni,et al.  Linear classification of low-resolution EEG patterns produced by imagined hand movements. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Joseph R. Smith,et al.  Subdural Electrode-Associated Complications: A 20-Year Experience , 2007, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[12]  K. Jellinger Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2009 .

[13]  N. Ramsey,et al.  Towards human BCI applications based on cognitive brain systems: an investigation of neural signals recorded from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  P. Gosselaar,et al.  [Intracranial EEG monitoring for epilepsy surgery using electrode grids--results in the first 22 Dutch patients]. , 2006, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[15]  G. Biggio,et al.  Biochemical and electrophysiologic evidence that propofol enhances GABAergic transmission in the rat brain. , 1991, Anesthesiology.

[16]  W. Freeman,et al.  Spatial spectral analysis of human electrocorticograms including the alpha and gamma bands , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  P. V. van Rijen,et al.  Measurement of the Conductivity of Skull, Temporarily Removed During Epilepsy Surgery , 2004, Brain Topography.

[18]  C Gabriel,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  John P. Donoghue,et al.  Connecting cortex to machines: recent advances in brain interfaces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Andrew B Schwartz,et al.  Cortical neural prosthetics. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  Brigitte Rockstroh,et al.  Determining Working Memory from ERP Topography , 2004, Brain Topography.

[22]  E. Harth,et al.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of Eeg , 2005 .

[23]  Karla Felix Navarro,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey of Brain Interface Technology Designs , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Bernhard Graimann,et al.  Toward a direct brain interface based on human subdural recordings and wavelet-packet analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Karen Byth,et al.  Risk factors for complications during intracranial electrode recording in presurgical evaluation of drug resistant partial epilepsy , 2009, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[26]  B. Antkowiak In vitro networks: cortical mechanisms of anaesthetic action. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[27]  H. Saunders Literature Review : RANDOM DATA: ANALYSIS AND MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES J. S. Bendat and A.G. Piersol Wiley-Interscience, New York, N. Y. (1971) , 1974 .

[28]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[30]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Mu and Beta Rhythm Topographies During Motor Imagery and Actual Movements , 2004, Brain Topography.

[31]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Actions from thoughts , 2001, Nature.

[32]  Andreas Schulze-Bonhage,et al.  Signal quality of simultaneously recorded invasive and non-invasive EEG , 2009, NeuroImage.

[33]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[34]  Michael E. Smith,et al.  Monitoring Working Memory Load during Computer-Based Tasks with EEG Pattern Recognition Methods , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[35]  Nick F. Ramsey,et al.  Automated electrocorticographic electrode localization on individually rendered brain surfaces , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[36]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  Robert G Radwin,et al.  Electrocorticogram-Controlled Brain-Computer Interfaces in Patients with Temporary Subdural Electrode Implants. , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[38]  O. Burešová,et al.  Techniques and Basic Experiments for the Study of Brain and Behavior , 1976 .

[39]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-computer interface: a new communication device for handicapped persons , 1993 .

[40]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Conversion of EEG activity into cursor movement by a brain-computer interface (BCI) , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[42]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.