Pityopsis ruthii: An Updated Review of Conservation Efforts for an Endangered Plant

Pityopsis ruthii (Small) Small, Ruth’s golden aster, is an endangered Asteraceae species that grows in the riparian zone along small sections of two rivers in the Southern Appalachian Mountains of the United States of America (USA). Since 1985, the species has been listed under the Endangered Species Act by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The mission of the USFWS is to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continued benefit of the American people. The agency provides national leadership in the recovery and conservation of imperiled plant species by working with the scientific community to protect important habitats, increase species’ populations, and identify and reduce threats to species survival with the goal of removal from federal protection. Over the past 35 years, research efforts have focused on studies designed to delineate the range and size of populations, determine habitat requirements, reproductive and propagation potential, and understand the demographic, ecological, and genetic factors that may increase vulnerability to extinction for P. ruthii. Cooperative partnerships have driven the completion of actions called for in the strategy to recover P. ruthii, and in this review, we highlight these efforts within the context of species conservation.

[1]  P. A. Moore,et al.  Seed Production and Floral Visitors to Pityopsis ruthii (Asteraceae: Asterales), an Endangered Aster Native to the Southern Appalachians , 2021, Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society.

[2]  E. Schilling,et al.  Complete chloroplast genome comparisons for Pityopsis (Asteraceae) , 2020, PloS one.

[3]  J. Dale,et al.  Potential Effects of Climate Change on the Geographic Distribution of the Endangered Plant Species Manihot walkerae , 2020, Forests.

[4]  R. Peakall,et al.  Niche Perspectives on Plant-Pollinator Interactions. , 2020, Trends in plant science.

[5]  E. Yépez,et al.  Coupled plant traits adapted to wetting/drying cycles of substrates co-define niche multidimensionality. , 2020, Plant, cell & environment.

[6]  J. Wiens,et al.  Recent responses to climate change reveal the drivers of species extinction and survival , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Rong Tang,et al.  In-situ and ex situ pollination biology of the four threatened plant species and the significance for conservation , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[8]  T. Knoke,et al.  Climate change and mixed forests: how do altered survival probabilities impact economically desirable species proportions of Norway spruce and European beech? , 2019, Annals of Forest Science.

[9]  E. Schilling,et al.  Population Structure and Genetic Diversity Within the Endangered Species Pityopsis ruthii (Asteraceae) , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[10]  Geoff P. Call,et al.  Restoration of the Endangered Ruth's Golden Aster (Pityopsis ruthii) , 2018, Southeastern Naturalist.

[11]  T. Lovejoy.  Extinction tsunami can be avoided , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  B. Ownley,et al.  First Report of Alternaria alternata Causing Leaf Spot on Ruth’s Golden Aster (Pityopsis ruthii) in Tennessee , 2017 .

[13]  P. A. Moore,et al.  Current knowledge, threats, and future efforts to sustain populations of Pityopsis ruthii (Asteraceae), an endangered southern Appalachian species1 , 2016 .

[14]  B. Ownley,et al.  First Report of Aerial Blight of Ruth's Golden Aster (Pityopsis ruthii) Caused by Rhizoctonia solani in the United States. , 2014, Plant disease.

[15]  R. Trigiano,et al.  Propagation for the Conservation of Pityopsis ruthii, an Endangered Species from the Southeastern United States , 2014 .

[16]  Kimberly S. Sheldon,et al.  On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  R. Trigiano,et al.  Development of microsatellite loci for the endangered species Pityopsis ruthii (Asteraceae). , 2011, American journal of botany.

[18]  R. Trigiano,et al.  First Report of Powdery Mildew on Ruth's Golden Aster (Pityopsis ruthii) Caused by Golovinomyces cichoracearum (Erysiphe cichoracearum). , 2011, Plant disease.

[19]  R. Trigiano,et al.  Shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration in Pityopsis ruthii , 2011, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC).

[20]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000 , 2010 .

[21]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Using Population Count Data to Assess the Effects of Changing River Flow on an Endangered Riparian Plant , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  J. Brewer,et al.  The evolution of fire-dependent flowering in goldenasters (Pityopsis spp.)1 , 2005 .

[23]  V. Blok,et al.  Morphological, anatomical, habit, and habitat differences among the goldenaster genera Chrysopsis, Heterotheca, and Pityopsis (Compositae–Astereae) , 1980 .

[24]  J. C. Semple.  Cytotaxonomy of Chrysopsis and Heterotheca (Compositae-Astereae): a new interpretation of phylogeny , 1977 .

[25]  F. Skoog,et al.  A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures , 1962 .

[26]  J. K. Small.  Studies in the Botany of the Southeastern United States.-XII , 1897 .

[27]  L. H. Shinners.  The North Texas Species of Heterotheca, Including Chrysopsis (Compositae) , 2021 .

[28]  Loch Lomond Coyote-thistle,et al.  5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation , 2009 .

[29]  Cynthia K. Dohner.  U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , 1998 .

[30]  S. Sloan.  Allozyrne Variation Within and Between Populations of Ruth's Golden Aster, Pityopsis ruthii (Small) Small , 1994 .

[31]  U. Fish.  Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants , 1987 .