Retention Capacity: A Metric to Link Stream Ecology and Storm-Water Management

A major impact on stream ecosystems in urban catchments is the increased frequency of runoff of poor quality storm water. This problem has not been commonly addressed in storm-water management, which usually focuses on pollutant load reduction or abatement of peak flows, or in some cases on minimization of impervious area. If stream ecosystems are to be restored or protected, a greater focus is required on the minimization of hydraulic connection between impervious surfaces and streams for small, frequent rain events. We propose new objectives for storm-water management. We suggest a primary objective of zero directly connected imperviousness for catchments where the ecological objective is to protect stream ecosystems, because the direct connection between impervious surfaces and streams is a severe stressor to stream ecosystems. We then propose an index to quantify the degree of connection of impervious surfaces, scaled to runoff frequency (retention capacity, RC), which can be used as a design objectiv...

[1]  Toby N. Carlson,et al.  The impact of land use — land cover changes due to urbanization on surface microclimate and hydrology: a satellite perspective , 2000 .

[2]  M. Boyd,et al.  Pervious and impervious runoff in urban catchments , 1993 .

[3]  B. Bhaduri,et al.  Assessing Watershed-Scale, Long-Term Hydrologic Impacts of Land-Use Change Using a GIS-NPS Model , 2000, Environmental management.

[4]  Ana Deletic,et al.  Variation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. , 2008, Water research.

[5]  M. Diamond,et al.  Use of Constructed Wetlands for Urban Stream Restoration: A Critical Analysis , 1997, Environmental management.

[6]  C. J. Walsh.  Protection of in-stream biota from urban impacts: minimise catchment imperviousness or improve drainage design? , 2004 .

[7]  A. Ladson,et al.  Scenarios for redesigning an urban drainage system to reduce runoff frequency and restore stream ecological condition , 2007 .

[8]  Luna B. Leopold,et al.  Hydrology for urban land plan-ning-a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use , 1968 .

[9]  William M. Alley,et al.  Effective Impervious Area in Urban Runoff Modeling , 1983 .

[10]  W. Shuster,et al.  Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review , 2005 .

[11]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[12]  David Pezzaniti,et al.  Detention/retention storages for peak flow reduction in urban catchments: Effects of spatial deployment of storages , 2002 .

[13]  A. Deletic,et al.  Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large-scale design optimisation study. , 2008, Water research.

[14]  G. D. Taylor,et al.  Baseflow water quality behaviour: implications for wetland performance monitoring , 2006 .

[15]  D. B. Jennings,et al.  Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: a historical perspective in a mid-atlantic subwatershed , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  A. Ladson,et al.  Improving stream health in urban areas by reducing runoff frequency from impervious surfaces , 2006 .

[17]  James P. Heaney,et al.  Estimation of Urban Imperviousness and its Impacts on Storm Water Systems , 2003 .

[18]  Ana Deletic,et al.  Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  M. Boyd,et al.  Predicting pervious and impervious storm runoff from urban drainage basins , 1994 .

[20]  Stephen J. Burges,et al.  REVIVING URBAN STREAMS: LAND USE, HYDROLOGY, BIOLOGY, AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR 1 , 2004 .

[21]  B. Chessman,et al.  Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: A procedure based on habitat‐specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index , 1995 .

[22]  Lizhu Wang,et al.  INFLUENCES OF WATERSHED URBANIZATION AND INSTREAM HABITAT ON MACROINVERTEBRATES IN COLD WATER STREAMS 1 , 2003 .

[23]  C. Jackson,et al.  URBANIZATION OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS: DEGRADATION THRESHOLDS, STORMWATER DETECTION, AND THE LIMITS OF MITIGATION 1 , 1997 .

[24]  P. Groffman,et al.  The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[25]  R. Ourso,et al.  Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in Anchorage, Alaska* , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[26]  Tim D. Fletcher,et al.  Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[27]  M. Winterbourn,et al.  New Zealand Stream Invertebrates: Ecology and Implications for Management , 2000 .

[28]  R. Norris,et al.  What is river health , 1999 .

[29]  Scott C. Meyer,et al.  Analysis of base flow trends in urban streams, northeastern Illinois, USA , 2005 .

[30]  Elizabeth Brabec,et al.  Impervious Surfaces and Water Quality: A Review of Current Literature and Its Implications for Watershed Planning , 2002 .

[31]  M. Logsdon,et al.  Effects of Changing Forest and Impervious Land Covers on Discharge Characteristics of Watersheds , 2004, Environmental management.

[32]  J. Meyer,et al.  Streams in the Urban Landscape , 2001 .

[33]  G. Hollis,et al.  The quantity of stormwater runoff from ten stretches of road, a car park and eight roofs in Hertfordshire, England during 1983 , 1988 .

[34]  Haynes C. Goddard,et al.  Controlling Storm-Water Runoff with Tradable Allowances for Impervious Surfaces , 2003 .

[35]  S. Roberts,et al.  Catchment urbanisation and increased benthic algal biomass in streams: linking mechanisms to management , 2004 .