Beyond the Carrots and Sticks Paradigm: Rethinking the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism Experience of Bulgaria and Romania†

Abstract A paradigmatic change is urgently needed in European Union's approach towards post-accession conditionality, as demonstrated by the apparent failure of the ‘Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM)’ for Bulgaria and Romania to achieve its objective – assisting the establishment of the rule of law in the two countries. The article maintains that the predominating reward/sanction perspective on post-accession conditionality both in the academic literature and in political practice is inadequate for triggering genuine and sustainable reform progress in the Eastern European candidates. The particular conceptual and procedural deficiencies of the CVM for Bulgaria and Romania as a post-accession conditionality instrument are discussed. It is argued that the CVM has remained mostly an instrument for monitoring and assessment, while the cooperation aspect of the post-accession relationship with Bulgaria and Romania has been neglected. The article proposes an alternative approach, based on partnership.

[1]  E. Gateva Post-accession conditionality – translating benchmarks into political pressure? , 2013 .

[2]  V. Ganev Post-Accession Hooliganism , 2013 .

[3]  D. Toshkov Compliance with EU Law in Central and Eastern Europe: The Disaster that Didn't Happen (Yet) , 2012 .

[4]  C. Tănăsoiu,et al.  Post-Accession (Anti-)Corruption Record in Romania and Bulgaria , 2012 .

[5]  N. Papakostas Deconstructing the Notion of EU Conditionality as a Panacea in the Context of Enlargement , 2012 .

[6]  M. Vachudova,et al.  The EU's Cooperation and Verification Mechanism: Fighting Corruption in Bulgaria and Romania after EU Accession , 2012 .

[7]  Mihaela Racovita Europeanization and Effective Democracy in Romania and Bulgaria , 2011 .

[8]  B. Steunenberg,et al.  Living in Parallel Universes? The implementation of EU rules on movable cultural heritage in Bulgaria , 2011 .

[9]  REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL , 2011 .

[10]  E. Gateva Post-Accession Conditionality Support Instrument for Continuous Pressure? , 2010 .

[11]  A. Dimitrova THE NEW MEMBER STATES OF THE EU IN THE AFTERMATH OF ENLARGEMENT: DO NEW EUROPEAN RULES REMAIN EMPTY SHELLS? , 2010 .

[12]  Martin Mendelski Where does the European Union Make a Difference? Rule of Law development in South-Eastern Europe , 2010 .

[13]  S. Andreev The unbearable lightness of membership: Bulgaria and Romania after the 2007 EU accession , 2009 .

[14]  D. Papadimitriou,et al.  Between Enlargement-Led Europeanisation and Balkan Exceptionalism: An Appraisal of Bulgaria's and Romania's Entry into the European Union , 2009 .

[15]  Alexandru Grigorescu The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[16]  H. Grabbe The EU's Transformative Power: Europeanization Through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe , 2005 .

[17]  A. Björkdahl Norm-maker and Norm-taker: Exploring the Normative Influence of the EU in Macedonia , 2005, European Foreign Affairs Review.

[18]  Karen E. Smith Enlargement and European order , 2005 .

[19]  A. Dimitrova Driven to change : the European Union's enlargement viewed from the East , 2004 .

[20]  S. Engert,et al.  Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey , 2003 .

[21]  A. Moravcsik,et al.  National Interests, State Power, and EU Enlargement , 2003 .

[22]  I. Manners Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? , 2002 .

[23]  M. Vachudova The Leverage of International Institutions on Democratizing States: Eastern Europe and the European Union , 2001 .

[24]  K. W. Backe [Power and weakness]. , 1995, Krankenpflege Journal.