How the task of evaluating image quality influences viewing behavior

Image quality scores collected in subjective experiments are widely used in image quality research, particularly in the design of objective quality assessment algorithms. It is therefore of vital importance to make sure that the collected scores reflect viewers' opinions in real-life situations. However, just by giving the viewers the task of assessing quality, there is a risk that their behavior has changed from what it would be in a natural viewing condition. We here investigate this difference in behavior by examining the gaze response in both conditions, i.e. free looking and scoring quality, with the help of eye-tracking equipment. Even though the observed behavior shows similarities between the two conditions, there are also significant differences which should be taken in consideration in future image quality research.

[1]  W. Mcdougall An introduction to social psychology , 1909 .

[2]  R. Yerkes,et al.  Great Apes , 1929 .

[3]  G. S. Ghurye Caste and race in India , 1932 .

[4]  R. C. Langford How People Look at Pictures, A Study of the Psychology of Perception in Art. , 1936 .

[5]  A. Rapoport The use and misuse of game theory. , 1962, Scientific American.

[6]  A. L. Yarbus Eye Movements During Perception of Complex Objects , 1967 .

[7]  W. Mischel Introduction to personality , 1971 .

[8]  E. Aronson,et al.  The Social Animal , 1973 .

[9]  E. Fromm. The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness , 1974, Transforming Terror.

[10]  E. Wilson,et al.  On Human Nature. , 1979 .

[11]  Stephen Croall Nuclear power for beginners , 1978 .

[12]  J. A. Perry,et al.  Face to face : the individual and social problems , 1978 .

[13]  D. Spender Man Made Language , 1980 .

[14]  H. Birx,et al.  The Mismeasure of Man , 1981 .

[15]  P. H. Miller Theories of developmental psychology , 1983 .

[16]  Andrew Wheatcroft The world atlas of revolutions , 1983 .

[17]  Andrew J. Pierre,et al.  Weapons and Hope , 1984 .

[18]  J. Miner Hiroshima and Nagasaki , 1984 .

[19]  J. McConnell Understanding Human Behavior , 1986 .

[20]  R. Lifton The Genocidal Mentality , 2016 .

[21]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[22]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Task impact on the visual attention in subjective image quality assessment , 2006, 2006 14th European Signal Processing Conference.

[24]  E.C.L. Vu,et al.  Visual Fixation Patterns when Judging Image Quality: Effects of Distortion Type, Amount, and Subject Experience , 2008, 2008 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[25]  P. Mohanty,et al.  Human Rights in India , 2008 .

[26]  Judith Redi,et al.  Studying the effect of optimizing the image quality in saliency regions at the expense of background content , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[27]  Ingrid Heynderickx,et al.  Visual Attention in Objective Image Quality Assessment: Based on Eye-Tracking Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[28]  G. T. Buswell How People Look At Pictures: A Study Of The Psychology Of Perception In Art , 2012 .

[29]  R. Stromberg A History of Western Civilization , 2012 .