Effects of methylphenidate on sensitivity to reinforcement in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an application of the matching law.

The behavior of children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been hypothesized to be the result of decreased sensitivity to consequences compared to typical children. The present study examined sensitivity to reinforcement in 2 boys diagnosed with ADHD using the matching law to provide more precise and quantitative measurement of this construct. This experiment also evaluated the effects of methylphenidate (MPH) on sensitivity to reinforcement of children with ADHD. Subjects completed math problems to earn tokens under four different variable-interval (VI) schedules of reinforcement presented in random order under both medicated and nonmedicated conditions. Results showed that, in the medicated condition, the matching functions for both subjects resulted in higher asymptotic values, indicating an overall elevation of behavior rate under these conditions. The variance accounted for by the matching law was also higher under the medicated conditions, suggesting that their behavior more closely tracked the changing rates of reinforcement while taking MPH compared to placebo. Under medicated conditions, the reinforcing efficacy of response-contingent tokens decreased. Results are discussed with respect to quantifying behavioral changes and the extent to which the drug interacts with prevailing contingencies (i.e., schedule values) to influence behavioral variability.

[1]  R. Barkley.  Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  H. Quay.  Inhibition and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 1997, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[3]  V. Douglas,et al.  Effects of reward on delayed reaction time task performance of hyperactive children , 1983, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[4]  Gene M. Heyman,et al.  Effects of Changes in Response Requirement and Deprivation on the Parameters of the Matching Law Equation: New Data and Review , 1987 .

[5]  M. Rapport,et al.  Rate-dependency and hyperactivity: Methylphenidate effects on operant responding , 1985, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[6]  J. Borrero,et al.  An evaluation of methylphenidate as a potential establishing operation for some common classroom reinforcers. , 1997, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[7]  Aidong Zhang,et al.  A Primer Of Drug Action: A Concise, Nontechnical Guide To The Actions, Uses, And Side Effects Of Psychoactive Drugs , 1995 .

[8]  F. C. Mace.  Toward greater integration of basic and applied behavioral research: An introduction. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  Larry B. Silver,et al.  Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment , 1991 .

[10]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  G. N. Wilkinson.  Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. , 1961, The Biochemical journal.

[12]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  R. M. Knights,et al.  The Performance of Hyperactive and Normal Boys Under Differing Reward and Punishment Schedules , 1978 .

[14]  R. Fuqua.  Comments on the applied relevance of the matching law. , 1984, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  K. Ball.  ATTENTIONAL AND COGNITIVE FACTORS IN PREDICTING OLDER DRIVER PROBLEMS , 1991 .

[16]  F. C. Mace,et al.  Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. , 1988, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[17]  H S HOFFMAN,et al.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  W. Baum,et al.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  B. Martens,et al.  The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  R. Barkley,et al.  Stimulant drugs and activity level in hyperactive children. , 1979, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[21]  R. Barkley.  The ecological validity of laboratory and analogue assessment methods of ADHD symptoms , 1991, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[22]  W. Pelham.  Pharmacotherapy for Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. , 1993 .

[23]  M. Davison,et al.  The matching law: A research review. , 1988 .

[24]  B. Martens,et al.  Matching theory applied to contingent teacher attention , 1990 .

[25]  J. L. Walker,et al.  Effects of continuous and partial reinforcement and methylphenidate on learning in children with attention deficit disorder. , 1986, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[26]  S. Kollins,et al.  Experimental analysis of childhood psychopathology: A laboratory matching analysis of the behavior of children diagnosed with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) , 1997 .

[27]  N A Neef,et al.  Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[28]  Heidi Aase,et al.  Altered reinforcement mechanisms in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  R. Herrnstein.  On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  S. Kollins,et al.  Human sensitivity to reinforcement in operant choice: How much do consequences matter? , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  F C Mace,et al.  Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[32]  J J McDowell,et al.  The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. , 1982, The American psychologist.

[33]  Donald A. Hantula,et al.  Microworlds for experimental research: Having your (control and collection) cake, and realism too , 1998 .

[34]  B. Martens,et al.  The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: a demonstration of matching theory. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[35]  V. Douglas,et al.  Effects of reinforcement on concept identification in hyperactive children , 1983, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[36]  A preliminary comparison of reinforcer assessment methods for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. , 1995, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[37]  B. Iwata,et al.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. , 1996, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[38]  A. Neuringer,et al.  Is instrumental variability abnormally high in children exhibiting ADHD and aggressive behavior? , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[39]  F C Mace,et al.  A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory. , 1990, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[40]  W D Pierce,et al.  Choice, Matching, and Human Behavior: A Review of the Literature , 1983, The Behavior analyst.

[41]  W. F. Caul,et al.  Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity: a specific hypothesis of reward dysfunction. , 1987, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[42]  N. A. Neef,et al.  Limited matching on concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.